30 Songs You Might Not Have Known Were Covers...And Their Originals (Part 2) скачать в хорошем качестве

30 Songs You Might Not Have Known Were Covers...And Their Originals (Part 2)

30 More Songs You Might Not Have Known Were Covers...And Their Originals (Part 2). There will be several here that have other covers too, but i just included the few that have other famous covers that charted well. For example for 'Don't Turn Around' & 'Killing Me Softly'. Part 1 here -    • 30 Songs You Might Not Have Known Were Cov...   Let me know your rankings and favourites in the comments. Cheers! Early access to this video and all future videos on my Patreon here:   / mediaranker   Unfortunately I lost monetization on the channel on 16th July 2024 and my appeal was rejected on 25th July 2024. I thoroughly enjoy creating this content and the engagement it creates with the viewers and I hope to pursue doing it full time, any contribution towards helping me do that would be greatly appreciated! The Patreon is £4.50 a month and includes all these perks: • Early access to ALL Media Ranker videos! • Patreon exclusive videos • New videos every week! As well as: • Types of videos chosen by YOU - all genres, years, decades, eras etc. • Contents & ranking order of videos voted for by YOU...then I make the video! ...For example you can school me on the TRUE Top 100 (or 200) Synth Pop Songs! lol • Maybe live streams and other types of content you want to see too! Let’s create a great community there! Alternatively here is my BuyMeACoffee page for any individual donations or £3 membership: https://buymeacoffee.com/mediaranker THANK YOU! Copyright Disclaimer: Copyright Designs And Patent Act 1988 Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/publica... Fair Dealing Source: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exception... Certain exceptions only apply if the use of the work is a ‘fair dealing’. For example, the exceptions relating to research and private study, criticism or review, or news reporting. ‘Fair dealing’ is a legal term used to establish whether a use of copyright material is lawful or whether it infringes copyright. There is no statutory definition of fair dealing - it will always be a matter of fact, degree and impression in each case. The question to be asked is: how would a fair-minded and honest person have dealt with the work? Factors that have been identified by the courts as relevant in determining whether a particular dealing with a work is fair include: does using the work affect the market for the original work? If a use of a work acts as a substitute for it, causing the owner to lose revenue, then it is not likely to be fair is the amount of the work taken reasonable and appropriate? Was it necessary to use the amount that was taken? Usually only part of a work may be used The relative importance of any one factor will vary according to the case in hand and the type of dealing in question. Source: https://www.bl.uk/business-and-ip-cen... The concept of fair usage exists within UK copyright law; commonly referred to as fair dealing, or free use and fair practice. It’s a framework designed to allow the lawful use or reproduction of work without having to seek permission from the copyright owner(s) or creator(s) or infringing their interest. Fair dealing law is not only applicable to text-based works; it applies to musical, dramatic, artistic, literary and typographical works too. However, it does not cover the copyright of printed music. As an exception to British copyright law, fair dealing is governed by Sections 29 and 30 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, which outlines three instance where fair dealing is a legitimate defence: If the use is for the purposes of research or private study; If it is used for the purposes of criticism, review or quotation; Where it is utilised for the purposes of reporting current events (this does not apply to photographs) A statutory definition for fair dealing does not exist; it will always be a matter of fact, degree and interpretation in every fair dealing case. Nor is there a percentage or quantitative measure to determine fair dealing. The Intellectual Property Office lists the key factors used to determine the validity of whether a particular dealing with a work is fair as follows: Has the use of the work impacted negatively on the market for the original work? If the creator or owner has lost potential revenue through the re-use of their work, it is not likely to be fair. Was it reasonable and necessary to use the amount of work that was taken? The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 also outlines the potential fair dealing defences that permit the use of copyright works without permission from the author(s) or creator(s) under UK copyright law.