У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно How to get the best out of presubmission enquiries или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Caroline Halford, Adis Publishing Manager, explains how a judicious approach to presubmission enquiries and discussions with journal editors can aid successful article submissions. Recorded 4 January 2017 at a MedComms Networking event in Oxford. Produced by NetworkPharma.tv = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ABSTRACT: Journal editors are always looking to publish good manuscripts – ‘good’ meaning citations and downloads, which in turn drive up the journal impact factor and improve its profile. Agencies and publications planners who adopt a constructive approach to presubmission enquiries can enlist valuable help from journal editors in overcoming the challenges to publication. From a journal editor’s point of view, good manuscripts will fit the scope of the journal, not replicate recently published content in the journal or the wider field, be of interest to the readership, e.g. describing research that may affect future research or treatment; have novel findings – or be reviews of an area that has not been covered recently, have robust methodology, be fair and balanced, and use clear, concise language. Papers can be rejected outright for a variety of reasons related to the above, which will not be explained in a standard rejection letter. Common reasons for rejection after peer review include methodological flaws (in the case of original research), significant data omissions (in the case of reviews), overstating the conclusions, and plagiarism. Some of these issues can be successfully addressed by means of a thoughtful presubmission enquiry and maybe a conversation with the editor. Provide as much information as possible in the presubmission enquiry; be transparent about the history of the article; and address the previous journal’s comments (the pool of peer reviewers is very small!) or provide detail in the covering letter as to why this has not been done. Nowadays, many journals have cascading titles and may be able to find a good home for the work, even if this is not your first-choice journal. Written by Penny Gray, Freelance Medical Writer = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Caroline’s Linkedin page is at / caroline-halford-09295a17 More about Adis can be found at http://www.springer.com/gp/adis Filming and technical direction by Mario Crispino, Freelance Cameraman & Editor = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = We are building a library of free recordings, like this one, for a global pharmaceutical industry audience at NetworkPharma.tv and we’d welcome your suggestions for new topics and speakers. For the avoidance of doubt: this video is intended to be freely accessible to all. Please feel free to share and use however you like.