Canada’s Anti–F-35 Move Just Got REAL… and Washington Won’t Like It скачать в хорошем качестве

Canada’s Anti–F-35 Move Just Got REAL… and Washington Won’t Like It

#CanadaDefense #F35 #Gripen #NATO 🚨 BREAKING: Canada’s fighter jet decision just took a dramatic turn — and Washington is not happy. For years, Ottawa appeared locked into the F-35 program. But behind closed doors, frustration has been building over cost overruns, operational restrictions, and a lack of true control. Now, a new development is changing the equation entirely — and it could weaken America’s grip over allied air forces. This isn’t just about choosing a fighter jet. This is about sovereignty, control, and who really decides how allied militaries operate. Tonight, we break down: • Why Canada is re-evaluating the F-35 at the last minute • How engine control gives Washington hidden veto power • Why a European alternative changes everything • The role of Rolls-Royce in reshaping the balance • What this means for NATO, NORAD, and Arctic defense • Why other countries are watching Canada very closely This move has implications far beyond Canada. If Ottawa succeeds, it could open the door for other nations to reduce dependence on American defense supply chains — without leaving NATO. 📌 KEY POINTS COVERED: ✅ Canada F-35 controversy explained ✅ Gripen vs F-35 operational reality ✅ Export control and engine dependency ✅ NATO interoperability myths ✅ Arctic defense requirements ✅ Defense sovereignty and long-term costs ✅ Why Washington is pushing back 🔔 SUBSCRIBE and turn on notifications for deep-dive geopolitical and defense analysis. 👍 LIKE if you want more breakdowns that go beyond the headlines. 💬 COMMENT: Should allies accept dependence in exchange for security? #CanadaDefense #F35 #Gripen #NATO #DefensePolitics #MilitaryAnalysis #ArcticSecurity Canada F-35 debate, Gripen Canada analysis, Rolls-Royce engine defense, NATO fighter jet politics, F-35 export control, Canada defense sovereignty, Arctic fighter jets, NATO procurement crisis 📢 DISCLAIMER: This video is analytical in nature and based on publicly available information, official statements, and open-source reporting. It does not contain classified material and does not represent the position of any government, military, or corporation. Opinions expressed are for informational purposes only.