У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Judge QUESTIONS Mom's Parenting Decisions - Why'd She Let Son Go To Orthodontist With Dad? или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In this intense emergency family court hearing, Tiara Smith seeks sole custody and a protection order after her son Carson disclosed to his therapist that his father, Tanner Whitaker, choked him during a disciplinary incident. The case features testimony from multiple mandatory reporters including Carson's licensed therapist and a school resource officer. 📋 CASE DETAILS: Petitioner: Tiara Smith (Mother) Respondent: Tanner Whitaker (Father) Child: Carson (11+ years old, in therapy for 2+ years) Issue: Emergency custody modification after alleged choking during discipline Witnesses: School Resource Officer, Licensed Therapist, Both Parents County: Greenwood County, Kansas Judge's Concern: Criminal conduct allegations, mandatory reporter involvement 🔍 WHAT HAPPENED: Carson and his stepsister got into an altercation. The stepsister claimed Carson choked her and showed red marks on her neck. Dad confronted Carson, and according to the child's report to his therapist, dad put both hands around Carson's neck and pushed him against the couch. Carson told his therapist he was struggling to breathe and was scared to return to dad's house. Dad's version: He only touched Carson's neck with one hand to "show him what choking looks like" and never squeezed. He claims Carson was already crying and being dramatic about the discipline (loss of tablets/devices). ⚖️ MANDATORY REPORTERS INVOLVED: Tammy Downing - Licensed Clinical Therapist (filed DCF report) Deputy Matthew Metling - School Resource Officer (investigated with DCF) Both filed reports with Child Protective Services. Investigation was still pending at time of hearing. 🚨 CONTROVERSIAL MOMENTS: Judge questions mom about filing BOTH an emergency motion AND a PFA case Dad challenges timeline - why did Carson wait days to report if he was scared? Carson was with BOTH parents at orthodontist appointment but didn't tell mom No visible marks found on Carson's neck during therapy Zoom session Dad reveals he's still in anger management classes (not completed) Past testimony about dad's temper issues comes up Judge initially advises dad NOT to testify due to potential criminal implications 📊 OUTCOME: ✅ Mom granted emergency SOLE LEGAL CUSTODY ✅ Dad's parenting time SUSPENDED ✅ Dad gets supervised visits only (1x per week, public location) ⏳ Final PFA hearing scheduled ⏳ Judge orders private interview with Carson to hear his testimony directly 🎓 FAMILY LAW LESSONS: How mandatory reporters trigger emergency custody hearings The role of therapist-client privilege in abuse cases (waived by court order) Why judges interview children separately in abuse allegations Strategic filing: Emergency motion vs. Protection From Abuse petition How hearsay testimony works when the alleged victim is a minor Why attorneys withdraw from cases mid-hearing Dad's dilemma: testify and risk criminal charges OR stay silent and lose custody ⚖️ LEGAL NOTES: This case involves serious allegations that could result in criminal charges. The judge specifically warned the father that his testimony could be used against him in future criminal proceedings. Despite this warning, dad chose to testify and deny the allegations. The court noted all testimony about the incident was hearsay (secondhand accounts) since Carson himself did not testify at this emergency hearing. The judge scheduled a separate interview with Carson to hear directly from the child. #familycourt #custodybattle #emergencycustody #courtroom #protectionorder #childprotectiveservices #mandatoryreporter #Kansas #familylaw #custodyhearing ⚠️ DISCLAIMER: This is a public court proceeding. All information presented is part of the official court record. Names and details are used as stated in the public hearing. This channel provides commentary and analysis on family court proceedings for educational purposes. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more courtroom commentary and family law cases! 💬 What do you think? Drop your thoughts in the comments - Do you believe the dad's version or the child's report to the therapist?