У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно LAPD Officer-Involved Shooting Analysis: Brian Rodriguez Bodycam Breakdown или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
🔴 AGE RESTRICTED (18+) - Officer-Involved Shooting Analysis On September 3, 2024, Los Angeles Police Department officers responded to a vandalism call that escalated into an officer-involved shooting. Brian Rodriguez, 33, pointed what appeared to be a firearm at officers twice during a pursuit. This video provides comprehensive legal and tactical analysis of the incident. ⚖️ LEGAL ANALYSIS INCLUDES: Graham v. Connor (1989) - Objective Reasonableness Standard Tennessee v. Garner (1985) - Use of Deadly Force on Fleeing Felons California Penal Code § 835a - Use of Force by Peace Officers California Penal Code § 417.4 - Imitation Firearms 📊 WHAT WE COVER: Complete bodycam footage with expert commentary Timeline reconstruction and critical decision points Why imitation firearms create deadly force situations Practical lessons for civilians and officers Outcome: Charges filed, no injuries, polymer stun gun recovered ⚠️ CONTENT WARNING: This video contains bodycam footage of an officer-involved shooting. While presented for educational purposes, viewer discretion is advised. This content is age-restricted to viewers 18+. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📚 FAIR USE NOTICE: This video contains bodycam footage used under Fair Use (17 U.S.C. § 107) for purposes of commentary, criticism, education, and public interest journalism. Original footage: Los Angeles Police Department - Official Release (Public Record). This video is transformative, containing 60%+ original analysis, commentary, and educational content including legal analysis of California Penal Code § 835a, Graham v. Connor (1989), Tennessee v. Garner (1985), and use of force standards. No copyright infringement intended. SOURCE: Los Angeles Police Department - Critical Incident Community Briefing (Official Release) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💬 JOIN THE DISCUSSION: What's your take on this case? Was the use of force justified? Share your thoughts in the comments below. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more bodycam analysis, legal breakdowns, and law enforcement education. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⏱️ TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Content Warning 0:10 - Introduction & Case Overview 0:45 - 911 Call & Dispatch 3:05 - Context Analysis 3:40 - Bodycam: Initial Contact 5:13 - First Gun Point Analysis 6:03 - Chase & Shooting 6:25 - Post-Shooting Breakdown 7:10 - Arrest & Custody 8:45 - Stun Gun Reveal 9:35 - Legal & Tactical Recap 10:35 - Three Critical Lessons 12:05 - Conclusion ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ #Bodycam #PoliceAnalysis #UseOfForce #LegalAnalysis #LAPD #Education DISCLAIMER: This video is for educational purposes only. Analysis represents the creator's opinion based on available evidence and legal standards. This is not legal advice. Outcomes in specific cases may vary.