У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Understanding Decimal Precision in dbf Files with Python's dbf Library или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
This guide explores how to maintain `field types` and `sizes` in dbf files while using Python's dbf library, specifically within the Visual FoxPro environment. Learn effective strategies for handling `Double` fields and their decimal representations. --- This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/76877164/ asked by the user 'Viktor' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/19934225/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/76889088/ provided by the user 'Ramy Nabil' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12759597/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions. Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How can i save field types and field sizes after working in dbf library in Python? Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l... The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license. If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com. --- How to Maintain Field Types and Sizes in dbf Files with Python's dbf Library Working with dbf files in Python can present a variety of challenges, especially when it comes to maintaining the integrity of field types and sizes. Many developers using the dbf library alongside Visual FoxPro encounter issues where specified field types and sizes do not translate as expected. The Problem In one specific case, a user faced an issue with a field named DISTANCE, which was originally defined as type-Double, width-8, and decimal-3 in Visual FoxPro (VFP). After creating and modifying the table using Python's dbf library, the DISTANCE field type changed to B binary, and the decimal representation dropped to 0. Here’s an excerpt of the user’s Python code: [[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]] The expectation was to retain the original precision of the DISTANCE field after executing the Python code, but the result was a loss of the decimal count. Understanding the Issue Why Does This Happen? The discrepancy arises from the way the dbf library in Python handles the Double field. Specifically: The decimal places in VFP are mainly for display purposes and do not affect the actual data's precision. The dbf library does not support the specification of decimal precision in the definition of a Double field, which causes the library to omit this detail when modifying the table structure. This means that while the data itself remains unchanged, the metadata related to the field's decimal representation — which is primarily visual in nature — is not retained when modified via Python. Illustrating the Solution To visualize this problem more clearly, consider the following steps: Creating the Table in VFP: You can create your dbf table with a properly defined DISTANCE field like so: [[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]] Modifying the Table in Python: Next, we run a Python script that adds fields to the existing table: [[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]] Verifying the Field: After executing the Python script, the DISTANCE field type in Visual FoxPro changes to Double, width 8, decimal 0, but the data still holds the original value: [[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]] This allows you to confirm that while the display attributes of the DISTANCE field have changed, the underlying data integrity is preserved. Conclusion In summary, while Python's dbf library does not retain the decimal precision for Double fields in Visual FoxPro, the actual numeric values are unaffected. Understanding this limitation will help you navigate data manipulations more effectively, ensuring that the integrity of your data remains intact, even if the field definitions do not match expectations. By following practices that acknowledge these behaviors, you can continue to work efficiently with dbf files and ensure accurate data handling.