У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно How Yoon's impeachment trial kicked off and what to look out for in ruling on April 4 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
탄핵소추안 통과 및 11회 변론 주요내용 요약 정리 Now, let's take a minute to look back at what happened leading up to the verdict, and what the public should be on the lookout for. Our political correspondent Kim Do-yeon gets us up to speed. On December 3rd, 2024, at around 10:27 PM, President Yoon declared martial law. Lawmakers overcoming the initial stand off against the police and military rushed to the National Assembly and voted to overturn the declaration after six hours. 11 days later, with a dozen ruling People Power Party lawmakers changing their minds from the first vote, the second impeachment vote passes the threshold of 200. That kicked off the Constitutional Court case. April 4th marks 111 days since. The first hearing took place on January 1st, 2025 --11 of them in total. The impeachment motion lists five reasons why President Yoon's action was unconstitutional. One, the act of declaring martial law was not justified. Two, the details of how martial law will be operated. Three, the attempt to blockade the National Assembly including detaining politicians. Four, the raid of the National Election Commission and, lastly, efforts to detain judges. "On December 3rd, the Republic of Korea was neither in a state of war, armed conflict, nor facing a comparable national emergency. There was no reason for military involvement to maintain public peace and order through the use of armed forces." Meanwhile, President Yoon argues that declaring martial law is a president's constitutional authority in a national emergency. He claimed the Democratic Party of Korea has been abusing its majority to pass impeachment motions of key government officials and has cut budgets way too far. And, that there were anti-state forces already active in South Korea threatening the nation's security while saying the election system was mismanaged. While whether the nation was under grave threat could be seen as subjective, there is one objective fact the Constitutional Court justices paid close attention to: Did Yoon order the detainment of politicians? "The exact wording was to go inside the main hall and take out the lawmakers?" Among many witnesses second in command at National Intelligence Service Hong Jang-won took the spotlight when he testified that President Yoon indeed ordered him to detain key politicians and even had a specific list presenting a note he took while taking the orders. He claimed that he did not go forward with the order. "After hearing the plans to detain them at Counterintelligence Command's detention facilities and interrogate them, how could I take those orders?" His claims were challenged by other witnesses, including his former boss NIS Chief Cho Tae-yong. President Yoon also said the order was to keep a close watch on politicians likely to go against the decrees of marital law. There are eight justices on the bench currently. It takes six to uphold the impeachment. Kim Do-yeon, Arirang News. #President #YoonSukyeol #Constitutional_Court #Impeachment_trial #Hearing #Verdict #대통령 #윤석열 #탄핵_심판 #변론 #선고 #Arirang_News #아리랑뉴스 📣 Facebook : / arirangtvnews 📣 Twitter : / arirangtvnews 📣 Homepage : https://v2.arirang.com/ 2025-04-01, 20:00 (KST)