У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Legal Chaos at 181 Westchester Avenue: Lawsuits, Hidden Cameras & Alleged Assaults - PART 2 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Legal Chaos at 181 Westchester Avenue: Lawsuits, Hidden Cameras & Alleged Assaults In this explosive 2 of 2 part podcast episode, we dive deep into a legal showdown unfolding at 181 Westchester Avenue, Port Chester, NY—a property already tainted by scandal. The Main Event: Kavulich & Associates, P.C. vs. 181 Westchester Ave LLC At the center of the controversy is a heated legal battle between Kavulich & Associates, P.C., a law firm, and 181 Westchester Ave LLC, the property owner. The dispute revolves around the lease for Suite 301B, with Kavulich & Associates claiming they secured a five-year lease, while the landlord insists they only had a revocable license and now wants payment for buildout costs. Tensions escalated when Robert Contreras, the alleged managing member of 181 Westchester Ave LLC, physically confronted attorney Gary M. Kavulich and called the police, labeling him a squatter—all while Kavulich claims to hold a valid lease. The situation worsened when the landlord illegally locked the law firm out of their previous office, sparking an emergency court order to regain access. A Building with a Dark Past: The Hidden Camera Scandal This isn’t the first time 181 Westchester Avenue has been the center of controversy. In 2018, a maintenance worker was arrested for planting a hidden camera in a restroom, secretly recording women. The scandal triggered a lawsuit from Caro Home LLC, a former tenant, accusing the landlord of negligence. The landlord initially apologized but later dismissed the issue as a “misunderstanding”—even suggesting the worker might return to the job. To make matters worse, the building’s insurance provider, Chubb North America, refused to cover legal costs, arguing the acts were intentional. This led to yet another lawsuit, this time between the landlord and their own insurance company. Key Legal Questions • Does Kavulich & Associates have a legally binding lease, or did they get played? • Did the landlord break the law by locking them out and demanding money for buildout costs? • How does the hidden camera scandal factor into the building’s credibility? • Could the alleged assault by Robert Contreras lead to additional criminal or civil charges? This case is more than just a legal dispute—it’s a battle over contracts, credibility, and corruption at a property with a history of shady dealings. Stay tuned as we break it all down in this must-hear podcast.