ChatGPT's New Image Model VS Nano Banana Pro! (12 Head to Head Tests) скачать в хорошем качестве

ChatGPT's New Image Model VS Nano Banana Pro! (12 Head to Head Tests)

👉 Join The AI Edge & learn to master + sell AI solutions: https://www.skool.com/the-ai-edge/about 🤝 Ready to transform your business with AI? Let's talk: https://ageraai.ai 🔗 Links Mentioned: 🔥 Gemini Nano Banana Pro: https://gemini.google/overview/image-... ⚙️ ChatGPT Image 1.5: https://openai.com/index/new-chatgpt-... 👀 Video Overview: OpenAI just dropped ChatGPT Image 1.5 — but is it actually better than Google's Imagen 3 (Nano Banana Pro)? I put both models through 12 brutal use cases that AI image generators traditionally struggle with: hands, text, counting, reflections, water physics, and character consistency. The results genuinely surprised me. One model produces more "polished" outputs, the other creates more realistic scenes — and the winner isn't who you'd expect. No cherry-picking — each model got one attempt per prompt. 🔍 What You'll Learn: How to benchmark AI image models using Artificial Analysis AI Which model handles hands and fingers better (the classic AI fail) Text generation comparison — neon signs with accurate spelling Can AI count? Testing "exactly 7 apples" on both models Complex scene composition with multiple subjects (dog, cat, parrot) Water physics and realistic pouring/splashing Reflection accuracy in mirrors and glass Fine detail rendering (gold chains and jewellery) Character consistency — putting myself into AI-generated scenes Why one model looks "plasticky" and the other doesn't 📌 Chapters: 0:00 – Intro: ChatGPT Image 1.5 vs Nano Banana Pro 0:25 – Artificial Analysis AI Benchmarks 0:54 – The 12 Use Cases Overview 1:13 – Test 1: Hands (Pianist Close-Up) 2:23 – Test 2: Text (Neon Sign "Wednesday Special") 4:18 – Test 3: Counting (Exactly 7 Apples) 5:53 – Test 4: Multiple Subjects (Dog, Cat, Parrot) 7:30 – Test 5: Teeth & Skin (Close-Up Portrait) 8:50 – Test 6: Multiple Light Sources (Red & Blue Neon) 10:08 – Test 7: Mirror Reflection (Woman in Red Dress) 12:14 – Test 8: Fine Jewellery (Gold Chain Macro) 13:29 – Test 9: Water Pouring (Splash Physics) 14:56 – Test 10: Goldfish Bowl (Glass Refraction) 16:33 – Test 11: Character Consistency (Half-Submerged Face) 18:24 – Test 12: Character in New Scene (Tokyo Street) 18:47 – Final Verdict: Which Model Wins? 19:15 – Join The AI Edge Community 🔥 Why Watch? See real side-by-side outputs (not cherry-picked best results) Understand where each model excels and fails Learn which model to use for different use cases Get the exact prompts I used for testing Discover why "realism" and "polish" aren't the same thing Perfect for creators choosing between ChatGPT Plus and Gemini 🔑 Keywords: ChatGPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini, AI image generator comparison 2025, ChatGPT vs Imagen 3, best AI image generator, Nano Banana Pro review, AI image quality test, ChatGPT image generation review, Gemini AI images, AI hands test, AI text generation, character consistency AI, OpenAI vs Google images 🇬🇧 UK: Trying to decide between ChatGPT Plus and Google Gemini for AI image generation? This head-to-head comparison tests both models on 12 real-world challenges — hands, text, reflections, and more. Perfect for UK creators and agencies choosing which subscription is worth the money. Spoiler: the "better" model depends entirely on your use case. 🇺🇸 US: ChatGPT Image 1.5 just launched — but does it beat Google's Imagen 3? I ran 12 stress tests comparing both models on the hardest AI image challenges. If you're deciding between ChatGPT Plus ($20/mo) and Gemini Advanced, this breakdown shows exactly where each model wins and fails. No hype, just results. 🌍 Global: The ultimate AI image generator showdown: ChatGPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini Imagen 3 (Nano Banana Pro). 12 use cases, one attempt each, no cherry-picking. Covers hands, text, counting, reflections, water physics, and character consistency. Watch before choosing which AI subscription to pay for.