У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Should Jurors Be Instructed About Jury Nullification? [POLICYbrief] или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
When a member of a jury believes a defendant is guilty and chooses to acquit the defendant anyway for reasons of justice, law misapplication, or harsh punishment, this is known as jury nullification. The validity of jury nullification is an idea that is hotly debated in criminal justice, and in this episode of POLICYbrief, Cato Institute’s Clark Neily argues in favor of instructing jurors about what Neily calls “conscientious acquittal,” while Berkeley Law’s Orin Kerr argues that jury nullification empowers niche and sometimes undesirable views of justice. As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speaker. Learn more about Clark Neily: https://www.cato.org/people/clark-neily Follow Clark Neily on Twitter: @ConLawWarrior / conlawwarrior Learn more about Orin Kerr: https://www.law.berkeley.edu/our-facu... Follow Orin Kerr on Twitter: @OrinKerr / orinkerr Related links: Our Broken Justice System https://www.cato.org/policy-report/ma... The problem with jury nullification https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/v... Bring Back The Jury Trial https://www.law.georgetown.edu/public... Differing views: Jury Nullification: Good or Bad? https://www.lawliberty.org/2018/01/16... More on the debate over jury nullification – a response to Orin Kerr https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/v... It’s Perfectly Constitutional to Talk About Jury Nullification https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech... Changing views of jury power https://link.springer.com/article/10....