#223 скачать в хорошем качестве

#223

Complication, revision and perceived health after stress urinary incontinence surgery by mid urethra sling in the VIGI-MESH register. Description and medium-term incidence for 1814 women. Fritel X1, Campagne-Loiseau S2, Ferry P3, Wagner L4, Curinier S2, Saussine C5, Cosson M6, Thirouard Y3, Deffieux X7, Charles T1, Hummel M5, Panel L8, Lucot J9, Debodinance P10, Carlier C11, Pizzoferrato A12, Vidart A13, Thubert T14, Ramanah R15, Boisramé T5, Nkounkou E16, Fauconnier A17, Ragot S1, de Tayrac R4 1. Université de Poitiers, 2. CHU Estaing, 3. CH La Rochelle, 4. CHU Nîmes, 5. CHRU Strasbourg, 6. CHRU Lille, 7. CHU Béclère, 8. Languedoc Mutualité, 9. GH Institut Catholique Lille, 10. CH Dunkerque, 11. CH Châtellerault, 12. CHU Caen, 13. Hôpital Foch Suresnes, 14. CHU Nantes, 15. CHU Besançon, 16. CH Béthune, 17. CHI Poissy-St-Germain KEYWORDS: Prospective Study, Stress Urinary Incontinence, Surgery, Questionnaire Surgery for stress urinary incontinence by mid urethra sling (MUS) has become a standard widely used in routine clinical practice. The retropubic procedure is the one for which there is the most long-term data. Technical variants (transobturator and single incision sling) have been developed with the intention of simplifying the surgical procedure and reducing the risk of complications. Clinical trials are limited in size and are not designed to specify the incidence of rare complications. The registers offer the possibility of specifying the occurrence of rare events in routine clinical practice [1]. Our objective is to specify the incidence, and to describe the serious complications relating to surgery by MUS in routine clinical practice according to the type of sling (retropubic, transobturator, or single incision) using the medium-term data from the VIGI-MESH register MESH [2]. Read the full abstract text here: https://www.ics.org/2020/abstract/223