Highlights of an expert deposition of defense spine expert Dmitriy Kondrashov скачать в хорошем качестве

Highlights of an expert deposition of defense spine expert Dmitriy Kondrashov

In this video we dive into the expert deposition of Dr. Dimitriy Kondrashov, M.D., a defense spine expert in the case of Garcia vs. Lin (San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-19-576555). This deposition, conducted on September 2, 2020, offers critical insights for attorneys preparing for their first expert deposition. Watch as plaintiff’s counsel methodically questions Dr. Kondrashov to uncover his opinions, methodology, and potential biases regarding the plaintiff’s spine injury, causation, and treatment. Key Considerations for Attorneys: Get All Opinions: Ensure the expert discloses all opinions they intend to offer at trial, as seen when Dr. Kondrashov is pressed on his conclusions about the plaintiff’s lumbar spine injury and its relation to a June 4, 2018 collision. Understand What’s Been Reviewed: Identify all documents, imaging, and records the expert relied on. Here, Dr. Kondrashov discusses MRIs, medical records, and legal documents he reviewed, revealing gaps in his knowledge (e.g., lack of records for a third epidural injection). Clarify Opinions on Injury and Causation: Probe the expert’s stance on the injury’s cause, extent, and impact. Dr. Kondrashov opines that the collision had minimal contribution to ongoing pain, attributing symptoms to preexisting degenerative disc disease and other risk factors. Challenge Causation Arguments: Test the expert’s reasoning for weaknesses or biases, as plaintiff’s counsel questions Dr. Kondrashov’s dismissal of the collision’s role in the plaintiff’s ongoing back and leg pain. Assess Credibility and Qualifications: Evaluate the expert’s experience and potential defense bias. Dr. Kondrashov confirms testifying in dozens of cases, primarily for defense, which could be leveraged to question impartiality. Uncover Methodology: Explore how conclusions were reached. Dr. Kondrashov explains his reliance on MRI reviews, physical exams, and risk factors like obesity, offering opportunities to challenge his interpretations. Limit Testimony Scope: Pin down opinions to avoid surprises at trial. The deposition ensures Dr. Kondrashov’s testimony is confined to what was discussed, with counsel noting additional records could alter opinions. Support Settlement or Trial Strategy: Gather information to strengthen your case or expose defense weaknesses, as seen when inconsistencies in pain reporting and treatment necessity are highlighted. Impeachment Material: Identify contradictions, such as Dr. Kondrashov’s reliance on incomplete records or discrepancies between his MRI findings and other doctors’ reports, for use at trial. This video is a must-watch for attorneys looking to master the art of deposing a defense expert in personal injury cases involving spinal injuries. Learn how to strategically question experts to build a stronger case or prepare for trial. #ExpertDeposition #SpineInjury #PersonalInjuryLaw #DepositionTips #AttorneyTraining #DefenseExpert #LegalStrategy #Causation #MedicalExpert #TrialPreparation #LumbarSpine #LitigationSkills #CourtroomTactics #LegalEducation