INIU’s 45W Qi2 Slim Power Bank Falls Apart Under Real Testing скачать в хорошем качестве

INIU’s 45W Qi2 Slim Power Bank Falls Apart Under Real Testing

This INIU 45W battery bank had me excited with 5 PDOs, 45W output and Qi2 certified. Looks good on paper BUT in the real world, it's a bust. Here’s why you should avoid it. Get your own INIU Portable Charger, Slimmest 45W 10000mAh Magnetic Power Bank, Qi2 Certified,with Lanyard USB C Cable & Kickstand by using this link: https://mreh.ca/45jAyw1 *This is an Amazon affiliate link that will bring you to the right Amazon store for your location #ReviewerNotInfluencer #Reviews #iPhone In this video: 0:00 Intro 0:20 Specs 0:38 Charging Performance 1:31 Wireless Performance 1:53 Thermals 2:04 Design 2:42 Mag Strength 2:57 Cost & Value 3:01 Would I Get It? INIU Portable Charger, Slimmest 45W 10000mAh Magnetic Power Bank, Qi2 Certified,with Lanyard USB C Cable & Kickstand Review -looks amazing on paper -testing this product was annoying, kept reseting my meters -PPS rates were almost halved during the resets 3.3-11A at 3A but because thturned to 3.3-6 at 3A -claims to have a max output of 45W which is the highest in my test group -BUT it holds 45W for about 30 seconds on average. -in terms of voltage accuracy and stability, it was below average for PDO rates -PPS rates were pretty average -ran into similar issues when testing for real world capacity -would only drain at the lowest rate of 15W -on average, I pulled about 26.9Wh from the pack -for recharging, it took 43.5Wh to fill. -BUT it took over 3 hours to do that which is a bit slow -considering that the supposedly cheaper pack from INIu that we reviewed in this last video, this thing, has the same capacity and charges 40 mins faster -so with this pack we get 26.9Wh for every 43.5Wh we put in -that's an efficiency of about 62% which is average -for wireless charging, this pack gave me iPhone a paltry 11% or 1.5Why in 30 mins -that's really slow -for the iPhone to get that 1.5Wh, it took the battery bank 3.6Wh -which results in an efficiency of 43% which is a bit low -below average magnetic strength, not by much