У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Predictive Quality and the Reality of Real-Time Release Testing или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
This text explores the complex transition from predictive data science to real-time release testing (RTRT) within a regulated manufacturing environment. While digital twins and soft sensors offer the potential to reduce offline testing delays, the source emphasizes that a high-performing model is not a substitute for a validated control strategy. Successful implementation requires moving beyond simple correlations to establish rigorous lifecycle management, including drift detection, retraining protocols, and clear GxP governance. The author warns that engineers often underestimate the regulatory burden of proving sustained control and the organizational challenge of defining who owns model performance. Ultimately, transforming a predictive tool into a GMP-compliant system necessitates aligning technical innovation with the strict audit and validation expectations of quality assurance. Predictive Quality Is Triggering a Shift From Data Science to GMP Release Governance. As analytics twins move from correlation to decision support, manufacturers are confronting a core reality: once a model influences quality decisions, it becomes part of the validated control strategy. Real-Time and Predictive Analytics Are Reducing Rework, Not Replacing Release Testing, PAT and soft sensors are proving valuable for early deviation detection and operational control, but real-time release remains fundamentally about sustained, auditable assurance of validated conditions, not model accuracy alone. Model Lifecycle Management Has Emerged as the Central Risk in GxP AI Adoption, Drift detection, retraining triggers, version control, and auditability are now recognized as first-order quality requirements, with ad hoc model updates posing direct GMP risk. Scaling Analytics Twins Exposes Hidden Failure Modes in Data Integrity and Inputs, At manufacturing scale, model performance often degrades due to sensor calibration drift, sampling misalignment, and site-to-site variability, rather than changes in the biological process itself. Reduced Testing Burden Is Driving Demand for Explicit Governance, Not Fewer Controls, Regulators and quality units are emphasizing that RTRT shifts where evidence is generated, not the obligation to demonstrate control, making organizational ownership and sign-off a critical unresolved challenge. #Bioprocess #ScaleUp and #TechTransfer,#Industrial #Microbiology,#MetabolicEngineering and #SystemsBiology,#Bioprocessing,#MicrobialFermentation,#Bio-manufacturing,#Industrial #Biotechnology,#Fermentation Engineering,#ProcessDevelopment,#Microbiology,#Biochemistry,#Biochemical Engineering, #Applied #MicrobialPhysiology, #Microbial #ProcessEngineering, #Upstream #BioprocessDevelopment, #Downstream Processing and #Purification,#CellCulture and #MicrobialSystems Engineering, #Bioreaction #Enzymes, #Biocatalyst #scientific #Scientist #researchinstitute _____________________________ Timestamp Timestamp Problem Addressed 04:50–05:40 The Actionability Gap: Models predicting failure without a path to intervention. 08:35–09:50 The Tails Problem: Models smoothing over biological distribution extremes. 10:18–11:45 Model Drift (The "Day 2" Problem): Inevitable sensor aging and raw material shifts. 12:50–13:45 The Input Problem in Tech Transfer: Models breaking between Site A and Site B. 14:18–15:21 Proxy Decoupling during Process Deviations: Failure of turbidity/refractive index correlations. 15:30–16:00 The Drift Window Liability: Managing batches produced while a model was drifting.