Effects of Different Abutment Morphologies on Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Behavior скачать в хорошем качестве

Effects of Different Abutment Morphologies on Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Behavior

The transmucosal abutment of an endosseous implant is the direct connection between the dental implant with the saliva, bacteria, and other challenges in the oral cavity. Natural teeth benefit from gingival and periodontal ligament fibers that provide an attachment and point of resistance to bacterial or foreign body invasion. Dental implants do not have the same mechanism. So in DSI, we decided to help the body to withstand constraints by implementing an implant platform switching combined with a concave abutments shape. The recently published systematic reviews are based on documented human trials examining the difference in hard and soft tissue outcomes of concave abutments, revealing a statistically significant difference in marginal bone loss in favour of concave abutments. You can study the following papers or watch the 4-minute video. Enjoy! For more details: Sol Tel: +1.972.200.3265 | Cell/WhatsApp: +972.586.100.500 https://dsisrael.co/contform⠀ Dental Solutions Israel Our website — https://dsisrael.com/ Study papers list: 1. den Hartog L, Raghoebar GM, Slater JJ, Stellingsma K, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Single‐tooth implants with different neck designs: A randomized clinical trial evaluating the aesthetic outcome. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:311–321. 2. Patil R, Gresnigt MM, Mahesh K, Dilbaghi A, Cune MS. Esthetic evaluation of anterior single‐tooth implants with different abutment designs— Patients’ satisfaction compared to dentists’ observations. J Prosthodont 2017;26:395–398. 3. Rodríguez X, Vela X, Calvo-Guirado JL, Nart J, Stappert CF. Effect of platform switching on collagen fiber orientation and bone resorption around dental implants: A preliminary histologic animal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1116–1122. 4. Cocchetto R, Canullo L. The “hybrid abutment”: A new design for implant cemented restorations in the esthetic zones. Int J Esthet Dent 2015;10:186–208. 5. Rompen E, Raepsaet N, Domken O, Touati B, Van Dooren E. Soft tissue stability at the facial aspect of gingivally converging abutments in the esthetic zone: A pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(6 suppl): s119–s125. 6. Sanz-Martín I, Sanz-Sánchez I, Carrillo de Albornoz A, Figuero E, Sanz M. Effects of modified abutment characteristics on peri-implant soft tissue health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:118–129. 7. Rompen E. The impact of the type and configuration of abutments and their (repeated) removal on the attachment level and marginal bone. Eur J Oral Implantol 2012;5(suppl):s83–s90. 8. Blanco J, Pico A, Caneiro L, Nóvoa L, Batalla P, Martín-Lancharro P. Effect of abutment height on interproximal implant bone level in the early healing: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29:108–117. 9. Borges T, Leitão B, Pereira M, Carvalho Á, Galindo-Moreno P. Influence of the abutment height and connection timing in early peri-implant marginal bone changes A prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:907–914. 10. Galindo-Moreno P, León-Cano A, Ortega-Oller I, et al. Prosthetic abutment height is a key factor in peri-implant marginal bone loss. J Dent Res 2014;93(suppl 7):s80–s85. 11. Gutmacher Z, Levi G, Blumenfeld I, Machtei EE. Soft and hard tissue 12. Patil R, den Hartog L, Dilbaghi A, de Jong B, Kerdijk W, Cune MS. Papillary fill response in single-tooth implants using abutments of different geometry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:1506–1510 13. Spinato S, Galindo-Moreno P, Bernardello F, Zaffe D. Minimum abutment height to eliminate bone loss: Influence of implant neck design and platform switching. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:405–411. 14. Esposito M, Cardaropoli D, Gobbato L, et al. The role of dental implant abutment design on the aesthetic outcome: Preliminary 3-month postloading results from a multicentre split-mouth randomised controlled trial comparing two different abutment designs. Eur J Oral Implantol 2018;11:77–87 15. Sánchez-Siles, M, Muñoz-Cámara D, Salazar-Sánchez N, CamachoAlonso F, Calvo-Guirado J. L. Crestal bone loss around submerged and non-submerged implants during the osseointegration phase with different healing abutment designs: A randomized prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:808–812 16. Chien HH, Schroering RL, Prasad HS, Tatakis DN. Effects of a new implant abutment design on peri-implant soft tissues. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:581–588 17. Ruggeri A, Franchi M, Marini N, Trisi P, Piatelli A. Supracrestal circular collagen fiber network around osseointegrated non-submerged titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:169–175. 18. Goktas S, Dmytryk JJ, McFetridge PS. Biomechanical behaviour of oral soft tissues. J Periodontol 2011;82:1178–1186