Blinking Eyes (I Like The Way You Blink) Michael Caine VS ©Awoken Eye. скачать в хорошем качестве

Blinking Eyes (I Like The Way You Blink) Michael Caine VS ©Awoken Eye.

Music Video : Blinking Eyes (I Like The Way You Blink) - Michael Caine VS ©Awoken Eye. The Music Video : Blinking Eyes ( I Like The Way You Blink) - Michael Caine VS ©Awoken Eye. Inspired By A Screenplay From An Award Winning English Writer Who Tells The Most Amazing And Hilariously Dark, Gut Turning, Black Comedy About Our ‘REAL’ Past And Your Predicted Upcoming Future...As No-one Has Heard It Before. You Should Be Eager to Hear It. Your Lives And Your Sanity Could Depend On It. All Will Become Clear. Watch This Space, This Space Is The Place, It Will Be Unreal. Disclaimer : No A.I Was Used, Harmed, Or Mistreated During The Making Of This Video. All Plants And Humans Were Well Watered And Fed. More Aliens Were Welcomed. We Danced. We Laughed. We Created. *See Awoken Eye Terms & Conditions For More Details. - ©Awoken Eye. ********************************************************************************************************* Under Fair Use ( U.S ) And Parody Copyright Law (UK) Some Small Portions Of Video And Audio Have Been Used To Create This Original And Glitchy Art Piece. © The Short Clips Used In This Music Video Are From Well Known, Famous Old Clips, Already In The Public Domain. In No Way Can This Edited Original Awoken Eye Music Video Be Misunderstood To Be True To Life Or Anything But An Odd, Slightly Weird, Parody For Viewer. In No Way Is Any Meaning Relevant To The Time The Footage Was First Recorded. Your Thoughts Are Your Own And We Don't Want To Know What Goes On In Your Grubby Minds. So We All Must Remember 'True To Life' Is a Subjective Perception. We Are Not Responsible For Any Viewers Standard Subjective Perception Or Influenced Perception Due To Mental illness, Consumed Substances, Liquids, Gases, Or Other Misguided Influence Or Mentor. Please Read This Description For Clarity. You Are Ok… It’s Not Real … It's Really Not Real... Nothing Is Real.. You Can’t Be Harmed Here. Smile. Your On Camera. Someone Is Watching You Always. - ©Awoken Eye. ********************************************************************************************************* YouTube requires creators to disclose content that is meaningfully altered or synthetically generated when it appears realistic, particularly if it could mislead viewers into believing fake events, scenes, or people are real. The policy specifically aims at content that is not immediately obvious, rather than clear,, fantastical, or obviously fake content. When You Do NOT Need to Disclose (Obvious/Minor Changes) Disclosure is not necessary for content that is obviously not real, or if the edits are minor. ********************************************************************************************************* © Parody, Caricature And Pastiche There is an exception to copyright that permits people to use limited amounts of copyright material without the owner’s permission for the purpose of parody, caricature or pastiche. For example a comedian may use a few lines from a film or song for a parody sketch; a cartoonist may reference a well known artwork or illustration for a caricature; an artist may use small fragments from a range of films to compose a larger pastiche artwork. It is important to understand, however, that this exception only permits use for the purposes of caricature, parody, or pastiche to the extent that it is fair dealing. In the UK (Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988): Section 30A explicitly permits "fair dealing with a work for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche". This means you don't need the rights holder's permission if your use qualifies as parody. In the US (Fair Use Doctrine): US law uses a four-factor test for fair use, including purpose and character ), nature of the work, amount used, and effect on the market. Parody often succeeds under this test. Fair dealing Certain exceptions only apply if the use of the work is a ‘fair dealing’. For example, the exceptions relating to research and private study, criticism or review, or news reporting. ‘Fair dealing’ is a legal term used to establish whether a use of copyright material is lawful or whether it infringes copyright. There is no statutory definition of fair dealing - it will always be a matter of fact, degree and impression in each case. The question to be asked is: how would a fair-minded and honest person have dealt with the work? Factors that have been identified by the courts as relevant in determining whether a particular dealing with a work is fair include:Does using the work affect the market for the original work? a use of a work acts as a substitute for it, causing the owner to lose revenue, then it is not likely to be fair. Is the amount of the work taken reasonable and appropriate? Was it necessary to use the amount that was taken? Usually only part of a work may be used The relative importance of any one factor will vary according to the case in hand and the type of dealing in question.