У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Shaw v. Shaw (1965) - или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
THE STORY: Mr. and Mrs. Shaw were getting divorced. As part of their separation arrangement, one spouse wanted to include a clause that would prevent the other spouse from remarrying. Basically: "You can divorce me...but you can't marry someone else." THE HOLDING: No. The court refused to enforce the clause. WHY? Because a clause that prevents someone from remarrying is: 1) A restraint on marriage 2) Contrary to public policy 3) An unreasonable restriction on personal freedom Courts generally do not enforce contracts that restrain marriage. Marriage is considered a social institution the law supports, not something former spouses can block by private agreement. Watch my next legal case story! Wightman v. Coates (1818) - Heart Balm • Wightman v. Coates (1818) - Heart Balm #co... #youtubelaw #prelaw #lawschoolsuccess #lawmadesimple #lawmadeeasy #legalstorytime #legaleducation