Japan's Doomed Plans to Invade and Occupy Hawaii (Keeping Track of a Rapidly Changing World) скачать в хорошем качестве

Japan's Doomed Plans to Invade and Occupy Hawaii (Keeping Track of a Rapidly Changing World)

Japan's Doomed Plans to Invade and Occupy Hawaii; What Did They Hope to Achieve (Keeping Track of a Rapidly Changing World). The hosts for this show were Jay Fidell and Shackley Raffetto. The guest was Michael Lilly. The discussion was: Japan’s greatest blunder of World War II, and perhaps the worst strategic military mistake in history, was its attack on Pearl Harbor. But could it have saved that blunder by invading and occupying Hawaii? Indeed, Capt Lilly asks the question – was its failure to do so another strategic mistake? Japan had had its eye on Hawaii since the 1870s and even started arguing about invading the islands in the 1890s. Part of the reason Hawaii was hastily annexed was America’s concerns about Japan’s intentions. Throughout the 20th century up to 1943, the idea of Japan invading and occupying Hawaii were debated and advocated in novels, war games, and Japanese strategic thinking. Yamamoto, the architect of Pearl Harbor, argued in 1928 that in any future war Japan should invade Hawaii. Three U.S. war games in the 1930s, called Fleet Problems, demonstrated conclusively that Japan would have succeeded in attacking Pearl Harbor (and perhaps invading Hawaii). While U.S. planners failed to take heed, Japan relied on the results of the Fleet Problems in planning the attack. While those around Yamamoto argued the attack should be followed by invasion, Yamamoto decided against it – until two days after the attack when he realized his mistake and ordered that invasion plans be drawn up. Midway was to be the opening gambit of encirclement and invasion of Hawaii. Was invasion feasible? Could Japan have held Hawaii and conducted its operations in Southeast Asia? Historian and retired Navy Captain Lilly explores these issues. The takeaway was: We should examine Japan's plans to invade and occupy Hawaii in 1941, as a precautionary tale of what could happen in a world where sovereignty means less than before. The YouTube Playlist for this show is:    • Keeping Track in a Rapidly Changing World   Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com for great content and community. The hashtag keywords for this show are: #Michael_Lilly #Shackley_Raffetto #Japan #Pearl_Harbor #military_blunder #World_War_II #strategic_military_mistake #history #attack_on_Pearl_Harbor #war_games #Japanese_strategic_thinking #Admiral_Yamamoto #architect_of_the_Pearl_Harbor_attack #invasion_of_Hawaii #war_games #Fleet_Problems #invasion_plans_be_drawn_up._Midway_was_to_be_the_opening_gambit_of_encirclement_and_invasion_of_Hawaii._Was_invasion_feasible #Southeast_Asia #precautionary_tale #World_War_Two #War_in_the_Pacific #negotiation_strategies #a_world_where_sovereignty_means_less_than_before Our vision is to be a leader in shaping a more vital and thriving Hawaii as the foundation for future generations. Our mission is to be the leading digital media platform raising public awareness and promoting civic engagement in Hawaii. As part of that mission, to enhance the community conversation we provide a Commentaries platform for public expression on public issues. ThinkTech Hawaii is a Hawaii Non-Profit Corporation: CEO, Producer - Jay Fidell; EVP and COO - Carol Mon Lee; Video Editor - Malcolm Makaru; Administration - Maria Padilla.ThinkTech treats this video as licensed under a creative commons license, and invites the public to view, distribute, disseminate and share it under the terms of that license. The information in this video is not to be relied upon as legal, medical, accounting or other professional advice. For legal, medical, accounting or any other advice, please consult with your own professionals. The views and opinions expressed by the producers or participants in these programs do not necessarily represent the views of ThinkTech or its officers, directors, management or staff. We thank our viewers and listeners for their interest in our coverage and content and for their consideration of the views and opinions expressed in these programs.