The Honourable Peter Lauwers | "What Could Go Wrong With Charter Values?" скачать в хорошем качестве

The Honourable Peter Lauwers | "What Could Go Wrong With Charter Values?"

The Runnymede Society was proud to host the Honourable Peter Lauwers of the Court of Appeal for Ontario on October 29, 2020 for a virtual national event. Justice Lauwers discussed his article "What Could Go Wrong With Charter Values?" (2019), 91 SCLR (2d) 1. ______________ Disclaimer: The purpose of this presentation is to stimulate thought and discussion about law and legal reasoning. The author’s views are ventured for that purpose and are tentative and open to change, especially in response to cases and submissions offered by counsel within the context of a real case with real facts. As well, on general issues such as these and on smaller but serious concerns about the correctness of jurisprudence, intermediate appellate judges are permitted to comment. The Supreme Court recognizes that it does not have a monopoly on developing the law and that it is best developed by a dialogue among the Supreme Court, appellate courts and trial courts in the decided cases, with the assistance of the academy and counsel. See R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 at para. 56; Canada v. Craig, 2012 SCC 43, [2012] 2 S.C.R. 489 at para. 21; R. v. Mentuck, 2001 SCC 76, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442 at para. 17. In the end, the word of the Supreme Court is final and judges in lower courts must comply regardless of their personal views: Craig, ibid.