У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно BREAKING: RUSSIA WANTS THE IRAN STRIKE — HERE’S WHY или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
BREAKING: RUSSIA WANTS THE IRAN STRIKE — HERE’S WHY This Isn’t a Coincidence Story. It’s a Strategic Calculus Story. You’re not about to see Russia openly cheering a U.S. attack on Iran like a rival celebrating a defeat. You’re about to see how Moscow’s de facto strategic interests might align with escalations in the Middle East — not because Russia wants war, but because its broader geopolitical position benefits from instability that weakens Western leverage, reshapes global energy markets, and distracts Washington from Ukraine. This isn’t speculation. It’s observed foreign policy behavior, signaling, and power balancing. In this video, Buddy Analysis breaks down why certain Russian actions and reactions around the Iran crisis — including diplomatic positioning, rhetoric, and military restraint — make it appear that Russia benefits from U.S. strikes on Iran without directly endorsing them. In this breakdown, you’ll learn: Why Russia publicly warns against U.S. strikes and simultaneously avoids direct military involvement — to avoid escalation with Washington while benefiting from a distracted global focus. How Moscow’s deeper strategic priorities — especially maintaining the ability to negotiate with the U.S. and keep Ukraine off the front burner — shape its Iran posture. Why Russia’s economic interests — including higher oil prices and energy markets dependent on Middle Eastern supply routes — could be indirectly strengthened by broader instability (a dynamic analysts have noted). How Russia’s historical behavior shows condemnation without tangible military support when its own deeper interests are at stake. Why Moscow’s focus is on diplomacy, leverage, and balancing relations with the U.S., Iran, Gulf States, and China, rather than outright military backing of Tehran. How avoiding direct involvement preserves Russia’s freedom of maneuver while others bear the costs of confrontation. Where this puts the Middle East escalation curve — and Russia’s silent yet strategic gains. This video explains how in global power politics, a state doesn’t have to cause a crisis to benefit from its consequences — especially when competition with rivals like the United States spans multiple theatres (Ukraine, energy, diplomatic influence). It’s not about cheering conflict. It’s about understanding incentives, alignment, and unintended consequences. Because when strategic interests overlap with instability, the actions that appear beneficial for one power are often the result of structural advantage — not explicit intent. ⚠️ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER This content is strictly for educational and informational purposes. Nothing in this video constitutes political, military, legal, or strategic advice. Geopolitical analysis involves uncertainty and risk. Viewers are responsible for their interpretations. Always consult multiple reputable sources. Statements by governments and analysts do not guarantee outcomes. 🔔 Subscribe to Buddy Analysis for system-level breakdowns of global power, incentives, and crisis mechanics. #RussiaIranUS #geopolitics #middleeastcrisis #strategicanalysis #globalpower #energymarkets #EscalationDynamics #buddyanalysis