Proofs as Programs: Unifying Logic and Code скачать в хорошем качестве

Proofs as Programs: Unifying Logic and Code

The provided source introduces the "proofs as programs" paradigm, also known as the Curry-Howard Correspondence, which establishes a profound and direct connection between mathematical logic and computer programming. Initially considered distinct, this concept reveals that a mathematical proof can be understood as a computer program, and a logical formula corresponds to a data type. This structural one-to-one mapping fundamentally reshaped both computer science and logic, leading to practical advancements like proof assistants, advanced type systems in programming languages, and automated deduction. The paradigm originated with intuitionistic logic but has since expanded to classical logic and continues to be a vibrant area of research, promising a future of provably correct and trustworthy software. Glossary of Key Terms Automated Deduction: A subfield of automated reasoning dedicated to developing computer programs that can automatically find logical proofs. Classical Logic: The traditional system of logic commonly taught, which includes principles like the law of excluded middle (a statement is either true or false) and allows for proof by contradiction. Computation: The process of performing calculations or operations using a computer, typically involving algorithms and data processing. Curry-Howard Correspondence: An alternative name for the "Proofs as Programs" paradigm, recognizing the independent but related work of Haskell Curry and William Alvin Howard in establishing the deep connection between proofs and programs/types. Intuitionistic Logic: A system of logic where the principle of the law of excluded middle is not accepted unconditionally. Proofs in intuitionistic logic must be constructive, meaning that to prove something exists, one must provide a method to construct it. Linear Logic: A subfield of logic introduced by Jean-Yves Girard, which views propositions as resources that can be consumed or produced. It is particularly relevant to computation because it models the use and transformation of resources. Logic Programming: A programming paradigm based on formal logic, where programs are expressed as a set of logical clauses and execution involves searching for proofs. Prolog is a well-known example. Mathematical Logic: A subfield of mathematics exploring the applications of formal logic to mathematics and mathematical reasoning, focusing on concepts like truth, proof, computability, and set theory. Paradigm: A typical example or pattern of something; a model or way of looking at things. In this context, "Proofs as Programs paradigm" refers to a fundamental conceptual framework. Proof Assistants: Software tools that help users construct, check, and verify mathematical proofs. They use the principles of the "Proofs as Programs" paradigm to ensure the logical correctness of complex proofs. Proofs as Programs Paradigm: The central concept that establishes a deep, structural one-to-one correspondence between mathematical proofs and computer programs, suggesting they are fundamentally the same kind of entity. Provably Correct Software: Software that has been mathematically proven to meet its specifications and behave as intended, eliminating logical errors and bugs through rigorous formal verification. Rosetta Stone: A metaphor used to describe a key discovery or artifact that allows for the translation and understanding of a previously inaccessible or unrelated domain, much like the actual Rosetta Stone allowed for the deciphering of hieroglyphs. Type Systems: In programming languages, a set of rules that assign a "type" (e.g., integer, string, boolean) to various constructs, such as variables, functions, and expressions. Powerful type systems can catch programming errors early, before the code is even run.