У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Understanding Why Pyarrow Can Read Additional Index Columns While Pandas Cannot или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
This guide explains the differences between Pyarrow and Pandas in handling additional index columns, specifically focusing on the `__null_dask_index__` column. Discover how to understand this behavior and manage index columns effectively. --- This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/75178696/ asked by the user 'noobie2023' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8696281/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/75180719/ provided by the user 'SultanOrazbayev' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10693596/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions. Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why can Pyarrow read additional index column while Pandas dataframe cannot? Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l... The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license. If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com. --- Understanding Why Pyarrow Can Read Additional Index Columns While Pandas Cannot When working with data in Python, particularly in conjunction with libraries like Pandas, Dask, and Pyarrow, you might encounter situations that prompt curiosity about data handling. A common question that arises pertains to how these libraries manage additional index columns when reading data from formats like Parquet. The Problem Scene Consider the following code snippet that utilizes Pandas and Dask to manipulate and save data into a Parquet file: [[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]] Output: [[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]] In this run, you have: Created a DataFrame with a column named value. Converted it to a Dask DataFrame and saved it as a Parquet file. Printed the schema names using Pyarrow, which includes an additional column __null_dask_index__. Attempted to read back the Parquet file with Pandas, only to find that _null_dask_index_ was not included in the DataFrame columns. This leads us to question: Why does Pandas ignore the _null_dask_index_ column? Breaking Down the Solution The underlying reason for this behavior lies in how Pandas manages index columns compared to Pyarrow. Index vs. Columns Pandas Functionality: When reading a Parquet file, Pandas recognizes _null_dask_index_ as an index rather than a regular data column. This index is vital for keeping track of the data efficiently, but it doesn't appear when you check for columns directly. Verifying the Index: To see how Pandas handles this index, modify the example to explicitly set a custom index while creating the DataFrame: [[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]] Output: [[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]] Here, the _null_dask_index_ is preserved, and its value is indexed appropriately. Although it was not listed under df2.columns, it is indeed part of the DataFrame's structure. Understanding Metadata The Parquet files created by Dask and Pandas include a special metadata area that maintains details about column and index attributes. Here's how this works: Dask: When converting a Pandas DataFrame to a Dask DataFrame, it adds the _null_dask_index_ to help manage distributed data. Pandas: During reading, Pandas efficiently utilizes this index as part of its performance features but abstracts it from the list of standard columns based on DataFrame conventions. Conclusion In summary, the differentiation in how Pandas and Pyarrow treat index columns is straightforward once it's understood that: Pandas sees additional indexing information (__null_dask_index__) as an index, not a data column—it’s simply not listed when you print DataFrame columns. Pyarrow, on the other hand, provides a detailed schema view that includes all elements, which is why _null_dask_index_ appears. Understanding this subtlety enhances your ability to work with these libraries effectively, ensuring that data handling becomes smoother and more intuitive.