Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking 1971 скачать в хорошем качестве

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking 1971

lawcasenotes Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking 1971 facts Thornton threw his car into a car park. Outside the car park, there is a disclosure of prices and a report that cars are at risk from these owners. An automatic ticketing machine provided the ticket, an obstacle was removed, and Thornton parked his car. The ticket was asked to be printed in small print, covering the shape that appears in the circumstances. Unlike the machine, there was a notice on a pillar that the owners would not be able to injure any of their environment. Thornton's shoe lane parking (SLP) was an accident and he thought. issue When is a contract made with a machine; did the terms on the ticket apply ? held Terms do not apply. When the money is put into the machine, there is a contract. The presence of the machine is a contract offer.The terms were not offered after the agreement was made, and thus were not implemented. lawcasenotes