Lawyer Reviews DMA's Copyright Lawsuit Against Frauditor Troll. Is The Case Time-Barred? скачать в хорошем качестве

Lawyer Reviews DMA's Copyright Lawsuit Against Frauditor Troll. Is The Case Time-Barred?

This is just an initial peek at this lawsuit. I don’t work in copyright, but I did take a class in law school taught by a federal judge who drafted major portions of the DMCA, and did obtain a preliminary injunction for trademark infringement in federal court, and a few other issues regarding infringement which I resolved to my client’s satisfaction. DMA’s lawyer is asked in this video to address some of my questions, including whether Youtube’s Terms of Service (“TOS”) has time-barred this suit, whether a license already existed that prevents alleged infringement, and whether Google is forced to be brought into the case, as a necessary party. This lawsuit looks ripe for attack on Rule 12b6 (statute of limitations) and 12b7 (failure to join an indispensable party) grounds. I don’t have all of the details, so I put together what I had, and will allow DMA’s lawyer to answer my questions if he wishes, since he has already heavily publicized the case. I am expecting to be told I am wrong. If I get a response - and I think I will - I can delve further into any of his points. None of this is legal advice. Always consult a lawyer for any legal advice that is licensed in your area. This video and the views expressed herein are protected by California's anti-SLAPP statute regarding a public issue and public matter of interest. All rights reserved. Nothing herein can be relied upon, and no attorney-client relationship is formed. This video is for entertainment value only. My comments are mine alone, and do not imply or express any views on counsel's performance.