Times Now Debate: Advocate Aditya Pratap Explains the Legal Aspects of the Luthra Brothers Case скачать в хорошем качестве

Times Now Debate: Advocate Aditya Pratap Explains the Legal Aspects of the Luthra Brothers Case

Advocate Pratap underscores a critical point: Accountability in tragedies arising from regulatory neglect cannot be diluted by influence, ownership structures, or post-incident evasions. As highlighted by Advocate Aditya Pratap during the debate, preliminary findings indicate that the incident at Birch by Romeo Lane was not a mere accident but the outcome of systemic failures, from the use of a highly inflammable structure to alleged violations of fire safety and environmental laws. The choreography involving fireworks, the nature of the premises, and the absence of adequate safeguards collectively raise serious questions of mens rea and criminal negligence. Equally significant is the conduct following the tragedy. The alleged attempt to leave the country within hours of the incident, coupled with misleading claims in Anticipatory Bail pleas, may weigh heavily against the accused. Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, particularly provisions relating to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, obstruction of lawful apprehension, and negligent conduct involving fire, such actions are not legally inconsequential.