SUECIA + ALEMANIA + SERBIA Ordenan Evacuación HOY — "Posibilidad DESAPARECERÁ en HORAS" скачать в хорошем качестве

SUECIA + ALEMANIA + SERBIA Ordenan Evacuación HOY — "Posibilidad DESAPARECERÁ en HORAS"

On February 19–21, 2026, four European governments — Poland, Germany, Sweden and Serbia — issued urgent evacuation warnings for their citizens in Iran. The language was unusually direct: “leave immediately,” “while you can,” “as soon as possible,” and in Poland’s case, a warning that the opportunity to evacuate could disappear “within hours.” These statements followed the second round of US–Iran negotiations in Geneva, mediated by Oman, which ended without a written agreement. Publicly, Washington spoke of “two weeks” for further details. Privately, US media reported that the Pentagon had completed military preparations for a potential strike on Iranian targets as early as this weekend, pending presidential authorization. CBS News first reported that US forces were positioned and operational plans ready. CNN confirmed that while no final decision had been announced, preparations were complete. At the same time, a scheduled Senate testimony by CENTCOM Commander Gen. Michael Kurilla was postponed with less than 24 hours’ notice, raising further questions about operational timing. Satellite imagery analysis cited by CNN, referencing the Institute for Science and International Security, indicated that Iran was reinforcing tunnel entrances at facilities near Natanz, including the so-called Pickax Mountain complex, and completing protective construction at the Taleghan 2 site near Parchin. Analysts warned that additional hardening could reduce the effectiveness of potential airstrikes, suggesting a narrowing operational window. Meanwhile, Iran signaled internal adjustments. The appointment of Ali Shamkhani as senior adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was interpreted by some regional analysts as preparation for heightened instability. This video examines: • Why four European countries moved within 48 hours • The gap between diplomatic messaging and military positioning • The role of CENTCOM, the Pentagon, and White House decision-making • The strategic importance of Hormuz and global oil flows • The risks of escalation involving Israel, Hezbollah, Iraq-based militias, and Gulf states The stakes extend far beyond Iran. The Strait of Hormuz carries roughly 20% of global oil supply. Any direct US–Iran confrontation could affect energy markets, regional security, and global economic stability. This is not speculation. It is an analysis of public statements, verified reporting, military positioning, and observable diplomatic signals — presented with caution and without exaggeration. SOURCES CBS News – US military prepared for potential Iran strike https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-milit... CNN Politics – Trump weighing options on Iran; preparations complete https://edition.cnn.com/politics CNN – Satellite imagery analysis of Iranian nuclear sites (Institute for Science and International Security) https://edition.cnn.com/middleeast Stars and Stripes – Senate Armed Services hearing postponed (Gen. Kurilla) https://www.stripes.com/ CHAPTERS: 00:00 Evacuations Begin 03:00 Geneva Talks 06:00 Pentagon Ready 09:00 Kurilla Postponed 12:00 Carrier Deployment 15:00 Nuclear Sites 18:00 Leadership Signals 21:00 Regional Fallout 23:30 Hormuz Risk #Iran #UnitedStates #MiddleEastCrisis #Hormuz #Geopolitics #Pentagon #USIranTensions #OilMarkets #GlobalSecurity #IsraelIran #CENTCOM #NuclearNegotiations #EnergySecurity #MilitaryEscalation