У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно What was Jeffrey Epstein doing with that framed newspaper front page found in his wardrobe? или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
When the US Justice Department released photographs from inside Jeffrey Epstein's properties, most people focused on the obvious. The paintings. The photographs of powerful men. The evidence of wealth and access on a scale that most people will never encounter in their lifetime. But there is one detail that I cannot stop thinking about. Inside a wardrobe at Epstein's private island compound in the Caribbean, hidden at the back behind polo shirts with shoes stored below, the FBI found a framed front page from The Times newspaper. June 1994. The headline reads "Divorce is no bar to throne says Prince." It is accompanied by a photograph of Princess Diana in the dress that became known as the revenge dress. Let me give you the full context of that moment in history. On the evening that Charles gave his televised interview to Jonathan Dimbleby, in which he openly discussed ending his marriage to Diana, she appeared at a London gala in that off-the-shoulder black evening gown. While the nation watched her husband confess his failures on television, Diana walked into a room and obliterated every headline he thought he was generating. The revenge dress became one of the most iconic images in modern history precisely because of the timing. And Jeffrey Epstein had that moment framed. Hidden in a wardrobe. In his private island compound. Now I want to be careful here because the Justice Department released these photographs without any contextual information. We do not know definitively why it was there. We do not know when he acquired it or who gave it to him. The article itself notes that this newspaper predates Epstein's connection to Andrew. But here is what we do know. Epstein was a man who collected leverage. That was his entire method of operation. He did not collect compromising photographs and information about powerful people because he was a fan. He collected them because information was currency. Because knowing things that powerful people wanted hidden was how he protected himself and built his network. So why does a convicted sex offender have a framed newspaper about Charles's divorce hidden in a wardrobe? Not displayed. Hidden. At the back of a wardrobe on a private island that very few people would ever see. The article notes that Epstein was introduced to Andrew through Ghislaine Maxwell years after this newspaper was published. But that does not answer the question. If anything it raises a deeper one. By the time Epstein was building his relationship with Andrew, he apparently already had a deep and specific interest in the family that Andrew belonged to. Specifically in the most vulnerable and painful moment of that family's public history. The moment Diana was effectively declared disposable. Three years after that newspaper was printed, Diana was dead. I am not going to tell you what to think about the specific significance of this object. There are things we do not yet know and may never know. But I will say this. A man who built his entire criminal enterprise on collecting secrets did not frame a newspaper and hide it in a wardrobe on his private island by accident. Things that powerful men hide rather than display are not trophies. They are tools. What that tool was for, and who knew it existed, are questions that deserve serious answers. And the fact that nobody in the British establishment is asking them loudly enough is itself an answer of a kind.