У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Mehran score 2004 and 2021 for prediction of risk of contrast induced AKI или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
The initial Mehran score for prediction of risk of contrast induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention was published by Roxana Mehran and associates in 2004. They randomized data of over eight thousand three hundred patients to development and validation data sets. Clinical and procedural data from over five thousand five hundred were considered for univariate predictors of contrast induced acute kidney injury. Eight variables considered in the Mehran score 2004 were: Hypotension Intra aortic balloon pump usage Congestive heart failure Chronic kidney disease Diabetes Age above seventy five years Anemia Volume of contrast A weighted integer was assigned to each and total score was the risk score for each patient. It was classified as: Low risk: Score of 5 or less Moderate risk: Score 6-10 High risk: Score 11-15 Very high risk: Score of 16 A revised score has been published by Roxana Mehran et al in 2021, which had two models. While Model 1 included only pre-procedural variables, Model 2 included procedural variables as well. The study had 14,616 patients in the derivation cohort and 5606 patients in the validation cohort. Variables in the Model 1 were clinical presentation, estimated glomerular filtration rate, left ventricular ejection fraction, diabetes, haemoglobin, basal glucose, congestive heart failure, and age. Model 2 had additional predictors as contrast volume, peri-procedural bleeding, no flow or slow flow post procedure, and complex PCI anatomy. Contrast associated AKI increased gradually from the lowest to highest in the four risk score groups in both models. They found that inclusion of procedural variables in the model improved the discrimination of the risk score only slightly. Web: https://johnsonfrancis.org/profession...