Trump sanctioned ICC who issue arrest warrant to Putin &connive w/ скачать в хорошем качестве

Trump sanctioned ICC who issue arrest warrant to Putin &connive w/

🏛️ ICC and U.S. Relations In 2020, the Trump administration did impose sanctions on ICC officials, including then-Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, because the ICC was investigating alleged war crimes by U.S. personnel in Afghanistan. These sanctions were lifted in 2021 by the Biden administration. ⚖️ ICC Warrants The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin in March 2023, related to alleged unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children during the war. The ICC has not issued any arrest warrant for Netanyahu. Israel is not a member of the ICC, though discussions about possible investigations have been reported. 🇵🇭 Philippines Context The ICC has been investigating alleged crimes against humanity linked to Duterte’s “war on drugs” campaign. Duterte's Detention by the ICC Rodrigo Duterte is currently detained at the ICC's detention center in The Hague, Netherlands, following his surrender to the court in March 2025. He was arrested by Philippine authorities and transferred amid an ongoing investigation into alleged crimes against humanity related to his "war on drugs" during his presidency (2016–2022). The ICC has rejected multiple appeals for his release, including a November 2025 ruling that dismissed arguments about jurisdiction and his health. His legal team continues to push for medical evaluations and interim release, citing his age (80) and deteriorating health, but these have not succeeded as of December 2025. The process has been controversial in the Philippines, with Duterte's supporters calling it an "illegal detention" or "kidnapping" due to the country's 2019 withdrawal from the Rome Statute (the ICC's founding treaty). However, the ICC has ruled that it retains jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed before the withdrawal. This has deepened political divides, with protests and debates over sovereignty. Alleged Involvement of President Marcos (#PBBM) The Philippine government under Marcos cooperated with the ICC by facilitating Duterte's arrest and transfer, which some critics frame as "connivance." Marcos has publicly distanced himself from Duterte's policies while emphasizing adherence to international obligations, but this has fueled accusations from Duterte allies that it's a politically motivated betrayal. No direct evidence of personal "connivance" or illegal actions by Marcos in the detention process has been substantiated in official reports, though the cooperation itself is confirmed. Regarding the "cocaine addict criminal" label: There are longstanding public allegations against Marcos involving cocaine use. In November 2025, his estranged sister, Senator Imee Marcos, accused him of chronic cocaine dependency, claiming it has impacted his governance and led to corruption. aljazeera.com This followed a 2024 viral "polvoron video" purporting to show him snorting a white powder (widely speculated to be cocaine). en.wikipedia.org Earlier, in 2021, Marcos took a voluntary cocaine test amid campaign allegations, and former President Duterte called him a "drug addict" in 2024. Marcos has denied these claims, rejecting them as baseless family feuds or political smears, and no criminal charges have been filed. Trump's Sanctions on ICC Judges In 2025, the Trump administration (following his re-election) reimposed and expanded sanctions on ICC officials via executive orders, citing threats to U.S. sovereignty and allies. This includes four judges and prosecutors, with some reports linking it to the Duterte case—such as sanctions on a judge who denied Duterte's release. However, fact-checks and ICC statements clarify that the sanctions are broader, primarily retaliating against ICC probes into U.S. actions (e.g., in Afghanistan) and other matters, not exclusively Duterte-related. The ICC has condemned these as undermining global justice, but they haven't halted the Duterte proceedings. facebook.com Overall Context and Broader Views This situation highlights tensions between the Philippines, the ICC, and the U.S. Duterte's detention is seen by his supporters as politically driven interference, potentially with Marcos' implicit approval to sideline a rival faction. Trump’s sanctions align with his "America First" stance against international bodies, but they're not solely about Duterte—though the timing has fueled speculation. Allegations against Marcos remain unproven and are often amplified in Philippine political discourse, including family rifts and opposition attacks.On X (formerly Twitter), similar claims circulate in fringe posts, such as one alleging involvement by Marcos' wife Liza Araneta-Marcos in Duterte's "kidnapping," but these lack credible backing and appear conspiratorial. @FelipinazBalita For balanced perspectives, sources like Reuters, PBS, and Amnesty International emphasize legal processes, while pro-Duterte outlets frame it as injustice. If this is about a specific event or theory, more details could help refine the analysis.