У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Padlet vs Flip: which is better for peer assessment? или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Welcome to our latest video on the top EdTech tools for peer assessment in the classroom! 🌟📚 If you're an educator looking to boost student feedback, collaboration, and critical thinking, this video is just for you. Discover how technology can streamline peer assessment and make learning more interactive and engaging. In this video, we'll cover: • The best EdTech tools designed for peer assessment • Benefits of peer assessment for students and teachers • Tips for fostering a constructive feedback culture among students These innovative tools can transform your classroom by making assessments more efficient, transparent, and impactful. From Padlet to Flip, learn how to harness the power of technology to improve student learning outcomes. 🔔 Subscribe for more educational technology insights, teaching tips, and classroom innovation ideas. Hit the bell icon to get notified about our latest videos! Keywords: EdTech tools, peer assessment, classroom technology, student feedback, collaborative learning, educational technology, teaching strategies, formative assessment, peer review, student engagement, Flip, Flipgrid, Padlet Sources: • Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322. • Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. RoutledgeFalmer. • Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315. • Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53-70. • Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525-536. • Nicol, D. J., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102-122. • Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 23-38. • Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. • Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20-27. • Using peer assessment as an effective learning strategy in the classroom (chartered.college)