У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Standards of Judicial Review: APA Sections 701-706 & Agency Deference или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
This video provides a comprehensive doctrinal analysis of Judicial Review under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Professor Dru Stevenson breaks down the statutory framework of Chapter 7, focusing on the "Arbitrary and Capricious" standard of § 706(2)(A) and the "Substantial Evidence" rule for formal proceedings. The discussion addresses the availability of review under § 701 (preclusion of review and "committed to agency discretion by law"), the standing requirements established in cases like Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, and the evolving landscape of judicial deference. Students will learn the difference between "Hard Look" review and more deferential postures. For those accessing this via the Administrative Law D2L module, this lecture serves as the bridge between agency procedural actions and the finality of judicial oversight. The description is optimized to capture search intent related to the "Record Rule," the "Chenery Doctrine," and the scope of review for both legal and factual findings by agencies. #JudicialReview #AdministrativeLaw #APA706 #HardLookReview #Standing