У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Building a better blockchain или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
I’m back in the weeds on the Alignment Economy white paper, because the “simple airdrop” version works mechanically… but it still doesn’t solve the hard problems: misaligned AI, broken incentives in medicine, and media that optimizes for attention instead of truth. In this video I walk through the core engine again: Humans are units of attention (and attention is the missing “fifth primitive” alongside time, space, matter, and energy). Value is basically: the organization of matter and energy, across time and space, that benefits attention. Bitcoin was a critical stepping stone — but in practice it’s drifted into “digital gold” because of deflation + first-mover advantage, which pushes hoarding instead of everyday spending. So the goal is a system people actually use for daily transactions — with a Proof of Contribution Ledger logic: Every transaction is symmetrical: buyers burn points, sellers mint the same amount. 1440 active points/day (one per minute), but you can’t save them—use them or lose them. Earned points (what others pay you) can be saved. Supportive points reward durability and long-term usefulness (still using the desk/computer → creator keeps earning). Ambient points are a new way to think about taxes + shared infrastructure (being in a place, using a train, living in a territory). Then I get into the key stabilizer: daily rebasing. Your raw point balance may shrink over time, but your share of the system stays consistent — the intent is to preserve purchasing power while preventing runaway inflation as new points enter. I also dig into one of the hardest open questions: “percent human.” If bots and duplicate accounts can farm the system, nothing else matters. So I outline a practical ladder: prove you’re human at signup prevent duplicate accounts keep verifying over time (hack/bot drift is real) I’ve got an Excel model with a 15-day transaction simulation showing how rebasing behaves as new users join and value moves around. If you want it, comment and I’ll share it. But here’s the bigger pivot: even if the ledger mechanics are solid, how do we incentivize truth in media, prevention in medicine, and alignment in AI without hardcoding a million rules? My current direction is: build the money layer simple, and add measurement tools + metrics on top — a way to “zoom in” on whether people, businesses, and systems are moving us up (or down) Maslow’s hierarchy over time. I also connect this to the broader fork in the road Daniel Schmachtenberger talks about: centralized dystopia (1984 with better UX) decentralized collapse (Mad Max + deepfakes + no shared reality) a third attractor: decentralized coordination that can’t be captured That’s what I’m trying to build toward. What I want from you (seriously): Where does the math feel tight vs. hand-wavy? Does rebasing + burn/mint symmetry make sense as a foundation? What’s the strongest critique you have of “percent human” being feasible? If we don’t hardcode “truth/health/alignment,” what metric layer would actually work? Join the Discord if you want to jam on this with me (and/or help build it): / discord