У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Panchnama Witnesses and the Truth Behind Police Recovery in Criminal Trials 096 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
#PanchnamaWitnesses #CriminalTrials #PoliceRecovery #EvidenceLaw #IndianLegalSystem #CrossExamination #SupremeCourt 🔥 Panchnama Witnesses – truth or trap? 👉 Police say they prove recovery, defence says they destroy credibility. ✔️ Supreme Court rulings show why these witnesses decide the fate of trials. ⚖️ Watch how panchnama witnesses can make or break a criminal case! Panchnama Witnesses – are they the strongest support for police action or the biggest weakness exposed by the defence? 🤔 This video uncovers the truth behind police recovery in criminal trials and why these witnesses can make or break a case. ________________________________________ 🔥 Why This Video Matters 👉 Every criminal lawyer faces recovery memos and panchnama witnesses in trials. 👉 Section 100 CrPC (now Section 103 BNSS) makes their presence mandatory. 👉 NDPS Act imposes even stricter rules. ✔️ Without them, recovery loses credibility. ✔️ With them, the defence can still dismantle prosecution by exposing stock witnesses, hostility, and contradictions. ________________________________________ 📜 Statutory Framework Explained ✔️ Section 100(4) CrPC = Section 103 BNSS → two independent respectable locals must witness a search. ✔️ NDPS Act Section 60(1) makes independent witnesses compulsory for narcotics recovery. 👉 These provisions exist to give credence to police action. 🔥 Defence lawyers consistently attack the absence or unreliability of these witnesses in court. ________________________________________ ⚖️ Regional Practices – Why It Differs 👉 In Delhi & metros: people avoid joining police investigations → charge-sheets often have no panchnama witnesses. 👉 In UP, Bihar, MP, Rajasthan: almost every recovery memo has two witnesses signed. ✔️ But the defence often exposes the Stock Witness Problem – the same names used repeatedly, destroying the credibility of independence. ________________________________________ 🚨 Stock Witnesses & Courtroom Damage ✔️ Courts have repeatedly criticised the use of habitual or planted witnesses. 👉 Once the defence shows the same individuals appear in multiple cases, the entire recovery story collapses. 🔥 That’s why “independence” is not a formality – it is the soul of panchnama testimony. ________________________________________ 🕵️ Hostile Witnesses – Double-Edged Sword 👉 Many panchnama witnesses turn hostile in court, denying presence at the spot. ✔️ Prosecution suffers because recovery looks fabricated. ✔️ Defence gains a powerful cross-examination angle. 🔥 Hostility shows how police manipulate proceedings, creating reasonable doubt. ________________________________________ 📸 Electronic Panchnamas – The Section 65B Trap 👉 Police now attach photos, CCTV footage, or videos to panchnamas. ✔️ But under Evidence Law, Section 65B certificate (now Section 63 BSA) is compulsory. 🔥 Without this certificate, all electronic recovery evidence becomes inadmissible. 👉 Defence must always challenge admissibility at this stage. ________________________________________ ⚖️ Supreme Court Speaks ✔️ State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999) 6 SCC 172 – Constitution Bench: statutory safeguards in NDPS recoveries are non-negotiable. ✔️ Rohtash Kumar v. State of Haryana (2013) 14 SCC 434 – Hostility weakens but does not erase testimony. ✔️ Mukesh Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020) 10 SCC 120 – Police officers are competent witnesses, but independent witnesses provide fairness and authenticity. ________________________________________ 🎯 Defence Strategy – Courtroom Tips 👉 Question whether witnesses were truly independent or habitual stock witnesses. 👉 Highlight why local available people were not joined. 👉 Attack electronic panchnamas lacking Section 65B certificate. ✔️ Use memory-refreshing under Section 159 BSA to prove absence from the scene. 🔥 Every omission, silence, and contradiction = a weapon for the defence. ________________________________________ 💡 What You Will Learn in This Video 👉 Why panchnama witnesses are not mere formalities but decisive factors. 👉 How prosecution relies on them for credibility. 👉 How defence turns them into weapons for acquittal. ✔️ This is courtroom reality, not just theory. 🔥 If you’re a lawyer, law student, or fighting a case, this knowledge can change your trial strategy. ________________________________________ 📌 Indian Legal System brings you expert-level forensic and trial insights to empower you in every criminal case. Stay tuned, learn deeply, and step into court with confidence. ________________________________________ WE ARE HERE FOR YOU WhatsApp: Reach out to us via WhatsApp messages at +91 9910 765 379 Email: Send your queries to indianlegalsystem100[at]gmail.com Website: Visit indianlegalsystem.org for more information. Membership: Join now for exclusive resources and support. Visit https://indianlegalsystem.org/registr... Learn More: About Us: Visit - https://indianlegalsystem.org/who-we-...