У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно sued 48 hrs before it aired или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
The case of: Warner Bros., Inc. v. Am. Broadcasting Companies | The Greatest American Hero v. Superman | Warner Bros. v. ABC | 720 F.2d 231 (2d Cir. 1983) 48 hours before The Greatest American Hero was set to debut, Warner Brothers filed a lawsuit against ABC, claiming the show was a blatant Superman ripoff. They argued that everything from Ralph Hinkley’s flying pose to his superhero antics borrowed too heavily from the Man of Steel. Warner Brothers wasn’t just trying to protect Superman—they were trying to maintain control over the entire superhero genre. But how did they build their case? Well, they started by alleging that Ralph’s signature flying pose—one arm outstretched—was too close to Superman’s iconic flight stance. They also argued that The Greatest American Hero borrowed Superman’s classic catchphrases and even mimicked specific scenes, like the infamous moment where Ralph lifts a car. On the surface, these claims might sound convincing. After all, the image of Superman flying with one arm forward is instantly recognizable. But when you look closer, the case starts to unravel. Superman’s takeoff in the 1978 film and Superman II (1980) wasn’t particularly unique. He simply lifted off—no crouch, no run, no build-up. Compare that to a character like Thor, whose takeoff involves throwing his hammer and being pulled by its momentum. Unlike Superman, Ralph Hinkley’s takeoff was messy and comical. He didn’t fly gracefully; he flailed and stumbled, more like a regular guy with no clue how to use his newfound powers. Warner Brothers also took issue with Ralph flying over a city at night, arguing it was too similar to Superman. But what else was he supposed to do—hover in place or zigzag through the sky like a cartoon? This kind of claim feels like Warner Brothers was grasping at straws. They even tried to argue that lifting a car was a unique Superman trait, conveniently ignoring that every superhero with super strength has done the same. When their argument about audience confusion failed, Warner Brothers pivoted to a bold new claim: that The Greatest American Hero wasn’t just a ripoff, but that it actively damaged Superman’s image. They suggested that if audiences saw Ralph Hinkley’s goofy antics, they might start associating all superheroes with incompetence, which could hurt Superman’s brand. The court didn’t buy it. They ruled that Superman was too iconic to be damaged by a single parody show. This wasn’t just about The Greatest American Hero. Warner Brothers had a history of using lawsuits to shut down competition. In the 1940s, they forced Wonder Man off the market because he was too similar to Superman. They even managed to stop the Captain Marvel (Shazam) comics, which at one point were outselling Superman. Warner Brothers thought they could repeat history, but the judge saw through their strategy. The court’s decision wasn’t just a loss for Warner Brothers—it was a win for the entire superhero genre. It set a precedent that you can’t copyright a genre or a general concept. Without this case, we might never have seen parody superhero films like Hancock, Mystery Men, or Kick-Ass. What makes this story even more ironic is that The Greatest American Hero didn’t even last. It fizzled out by 1983, the same year Warner Brothers lost the case. Not because of the lawsuit—just low ratings. So Warner Brothers spent two years fighting to kill a show that was already dying on its own. They didn’t just lose the case; they wasted their time and money. In this video, I’ll take you through the entire lawsuit, breaking down Warner Brothers’ claims, the court’s response, and the lasting impact on Hollywood. We’ll analyze key scenes, show you the side-by-side comparisons, and explore why this case was so pivotal for creative freedom in the superhero genre. If you’re a fan of deep dives into movie history, legal battles, and the hidden stories behind your favorite shows, hit subscribe and join the community for more raw, unfiltered takes. Let’s dive into a lawsuit so bizarre, it’s hard to believe it ever made it to court. #superman #thegreatestamericanhero #lawsuit Become a channel member to get access to perks: / @rawteur