У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно My podcast on Salman khan defamation matter in Honble Bombay City Civil court или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
I recently appeared on a detailed conversation addressing an increasingly significant legal issue at the intersection of social media, free speech, and defamation law in India. The discussion arose from my representation of Salman Khan in a high-profile matter concerning online abuse and sustained social media allegations made by Abhinav Kashyap. In this episode, we examine when criticism ceases to be fair comment and crosses into actionable defamation, how Indian courts view online harassment, and the legal remedies available when digital platforms are misused to target individuals publicly. We also deliberate upon the broader impact of such disputes within the film industry and the responsibilities that accompany the right to freedom of speech in the digital era. This conversation is particularly relevant for media professionals, content creators, public figures, and citizens who engage actively on social media platforms, often without fully appreciating the legal consequences of online conduct. Key issues discussed include: • Social media abuse and the applicable legal framework in India • The legal distinction between criticism and defamation • Civil and criminal remedies for online harassment • Film industry disputes played out on digital platforms • Constitutional freedom of speech and its reasonable restrictions I trust this episode will assist viewers in developing a clearer understanding of media law, online accountability, and the evolving jurisprudence surrounding digital expression in India. Disclaimer: This content is strictly for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are personal and based on publicly available material.