У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Lexical Semantics in Formal Semantics: History and Challenges [ FJelinekSeries #52 ] или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
📅 May 23, 2022 | 🗣 Barbara H. Partee (University of Massachusetts Amherst) | 📝 Lexical Semantics in Formal Semantics: History and Challenges 🔖 ABOUT THE LECTURE ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔ ▸The early important achievements of formal semantics that made it of interest to linguists were in compositionality, i.e. ‘the semantics of syntax’, and in the semantics of a wide range of function words or morphemes and the constructions in which they occur -- determiners, especially quantifiers, tense and aspect markers, plurality, negation, comparative and superlative morphemes, and more. Montague assigned types to open-class content words, but did not try to specify their meanings, considering their study an empirical matter outside of formal semantics. Over the course of the history of formal semantics, there has been great progress on the study of some semantic properties of open-class words, including aspectual properties of verbs, context-sensitive properties of words like local and enemy, polarity items, functional and relational nouns, mass nouns, and more. What these lexical properties have in common is that they all play crucial roles in semantic composition; these lexical studies have been driven by the goals of compositional semantics. What has remained unanalyzed is the “remainder” of the content of open-class words; those are still treated as unanalyzed primitives. The issue of whether and how to try to add a fuller treatment of lexical content to formal semantics has a complex history which I will discuss, but was a side issue until very recently; and it is still draws less attention within theoretical circles than it does in the context of cognitive and computational perspectives. There are theoreticians who explicitly defend the idea of leaving the “remainder” of the meaning of lexical items unanalyzed linguistically. But even if one agrees with Montague’s initial supposition that lexical semantics is a separate and more empirical field of study, it would be a major advance if we could understand what human lexical understanding is like and how it interfaces with the construction of sentence meaning and discourse interpretation. 📽️ ABOUT THE SERIES ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔ ▸Within the regular Linguistic Mondays, special space is reserved approx. 4 times per academic year for talks given by leading specialists in the field of computational and formal linguistics and natural language processing. The invited speakers come from the most prominent research centers in Europe or outside this geographic region, and their involvemenet in the Series is also an opportunity for all interested participants for establishing contacts with the visiting professors and their teams. The Series is named after Professor Frederick Jelinek (18.11.1932 in former Czechoslovakia - 14.9.2010 in the USA), a honorary doctor of Charles University and a former prominent researcher at IBM Research Centre and Johns Hopkins University, who was a pioneering figure in the field of speech recognition and statistical methods in natural language processing, After the political changes in Czechoslovakia in 1989, professor F. Jelinek was regularly invited by our Institute to give courses and to supervise our students and his contribution to the development of the field of computational linguistics at Charles University is immense. ❔ SOCIAL MEDIA ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔ ▸web: https://ufal.mff.cuni.cz ▸facebook: / ufalmffuk ▸twitter: / ufal_cuni