CHEQUE BOUNCE - Landmark Supreme Court Judgement скачать в хорошем качестве

CHEQUE BOUNCE - Landmark Supreme Court Judgement

CHEQUE BOUNCE - Landmark Supreme Court Judgement What is section 138? What is the maximum punishment for Section 138? Can a 138 case be dismissed? Today, in this video adv. Papia (Decode The Law) will a landmark supreme court judgment related to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act deals with the offense cheque bounce. Section 138, primarily under India's Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act), penalizes the dishonor of a cheque due to insufficient funds, making it a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment up to two years, a fine (up to double the cheque amount), or both, provided key conditions like timely presentation, a written demand notice within 30 days, and failure to pay within 15 days are met. Bir Singh vs. Mukesh Kumar (2019) is a landmark Supreme Court of India judgment concerning the dishonour of cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The case primarily addressed the legal presumption of liability when a person signs and hands over a blank cheque. The matter primarily concerns convictions for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Judgement Link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/157736723/ 00:00- inward 00:30- facts of the case 08:51- outro CHEQUE BOUNCE - Landmark Supreme Court Judgement Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in India makes the dishonour of a cheque due to insufficient funds (or exceeding arrangements) a criminal offence, punishable by up to two years imprisonment, a fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both. Key conditions include presenting the cheque within 3 months, serving a legal notice within 30 days of return, and failure to pay within 15 days of notice. Acts and sections used in this video: Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 or Section 138 of the NI Act In Indian law, Section 138 primarily refers to the Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act, 1881, which deals with the dishonour of cheques (cheque bounce). 1. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act This section makes the bouncing of a cheque a criminal offence if it was issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt or liability and is returned by the bank unpaid due to "insufficient funds" or "exceeding the arrangement". Your Queries: Section 138 railway Act Section 138 of Companies Act 2013 Section 138 crpc What is Section 138 of Negotiable instrument Act Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act time limit What is the punishment for Section 138 Section 138 negotiable instrument act in hindi Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act latest the notice under section 138 of the negotiable instruments ... Drawer Has No Control Over Bank Account In A Case ... #chequebounce #cheques #supremecourt #decodethelaw MY SOCIAL MEDIA HANDLES: ▶️ Main Channel:    / @decodethelaw   📸 Instagram:   / impapia6   🐦 Twitter: https://x.com/decode_law?t=_WJNQcXG6l... MY VIDEO TOPICS: 🗺 Senior citizens:    • Senior Citizens - Landmark latest judgement   📘 Property transfer:    • Property Transfer   🔬 Cheque bounce:    • CHEQUE BOUNCE | LANDMARK SUPREME COURT JUD...   ☠️ Legal Drafting and Pleading:    • Legal Drafting and Pleading | Practical As...   💰Job Opportunities After LLB:    • Job Opportunities After LLB #law   🇮🇳 Constitution of India | Indian Polity:    • Constitution of India | Indian Polity   🌍 Transfer of Property Act:    • Transfer of Property Act 1882, TPA Lecture...   This video is made solely with the purpose of spreading awareness and educating the viewers strictly for educational and informational purposes. The information demonstrated and explained in the video are true to the best of our team’s knowledge and research. Nevertheless, if any error is committed, the same was never intended to be and is absolutely unintentional. In the event of any inadvertent error, kindly email us at decodethelaw09@gmail.com (mail subject : FEEDBACK) for necessary action, to resolve any error/dispute amicably.