The DUMBEST Disqualifications in Darts History скачать в хорошем качестве

The DUMBEST Disqualifications in Darts History

Darts has a disciplinary history unlike almost any other sport. In this video we break down the wildest disqualifications, bans, and enforced removals in darts history — from players being thrown out mid-match, to record fines, to drug bans, match-fixing punishments, and the infamous moment an entire organization effectively banned its own champions and reshaped the sport for decades. You’ll hear the full stories behind: The Lewis vs Painter Schiedam incident where BOTH players were disqualified Gerwyn Price’s record fine after the 2018 Grand Slam drama The Phil Taylor “missed double” controversy and why darts has no video review On-stage meltdowns and violence caught on camera Drug bans from cannabis to cocaine and mid-tournament removals The match-fixing crackdown centered around the Modus Super Series And the biggest “disqualification” of all: the 1993 BDO purge that helped create the modern PDC era Some of these punishments were deserved. Some were absurd. And at least one changed darts forever. RIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognize a "fair use" of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." This video and our YouTube channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above. Fair Dealing: Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 (UK) section 30 states "Fair dealing" with a work for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another work, does not infringe any copyright in the work provided that it is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. Copyright in a work is not infringed by the use of a quotation from the work (whether for criticism or review or otherwise).----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contact: darts4fans@gmail.com