У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Massie Asked Patel 1 Question In 67 Seconds — His Answer Destroyed Everything или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Massie Corners Patel: FBI Director Admits He Never Read The Epstein Files. In this explosive House Judiciary Committee hearing, Congressman Thomas Massie confronts FBI Director Kash Patel with the Bureau's own FD-302 witness statements — documents naming foreign dignitaries, Hollywood producers, and tech billionaires — and forces him to admit he never personally read them before claiming "no credible information" exists. 2,300 FBI files. Congress saw 90. Zero prosecutions confirmed. Watch until the end — Patel's answers raise more questions than they answer. Why did the FBI Director claim certainty about files he never read? Why has Congress seen less than 2% of Epstein witness testimony? Why have none of the named individuals faced federal charges? This video breaks down every key moment of the confrontation, the legal implications, and what it means for FBI transparency and the Epstein investigation. Red State Files is where political power, hidden decisions, and untold stories are examined quietly and on the record. We create fictionalized U.S. political hearings, intelligence briefings, and government scenarios inspired by past public claims and historical controversies. Each episode explores what could happen behind closed doors when power, fear, and ambition collide. No shouting. No spin. Just calm, cinematic breakdowns of high-stakes political moments. 🔔Subscribe to explore the files they never wanted opened. ⚠️ Disclaimer: All content on this channel is fictional and created for entertainment, commentary, and dramatization purposes only. Any references to people, institutions, or events are not intended to reflect real-world facts or current news. Nothing on this channel should be considered news, official statements, or legal evidence. The events discussed in the content may not be current; some narratives may be based on news and claims that were made public in the past, such as weeks or months ago. This channel is not based on a specific time period. These contents do not constitute news, official statements, or legal evidence.