У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The Philosophy of Despair: Postmodernism Explained | SPECTRE OF COMMUNISM или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
The term ‘postmodernism’ is thrown around a lot by right-wing shock-jocks like Jordan Peterson, often in tandem with Marxism: although these two sets of ideas are totally opposed. In this episode, leading comrade Hamid Alizadeh takes on some of the main luminaries of this obscure, impenetrable and ultimately reactionary school including Foucault, Derrida and Lyotard. Lyotard describes postmodernism as “incredulity towards metanarratives.” In other words: an opposition to ‘big ideas’ about history, truth, science and progress. But with these ‘big ideas’ discarded, what are we left with? As Hamid demonstrates, the answer for all the postmodernists is basically the same: we cannot know the world, let alone change it, all we can do is ‘think differently’, play around with words, and retreat to subjectivity. They even celebrate writing in incomprehensible gibberish and ‘believing in nothing’ as a ‘radical’ act! This cynical philosophy is a total dead-end which winds up in stasis and despair. In total contrast to Marxism, which recognises the world as made up of complex processes, and driven by an inner lawfulness towards higher and higher complexity. By knowing the world, we can organise ourselves to intervene and change it for the better. Postmodernism is not merely a reactionary worldview, Hamid explains, it has a directly negative impact on society, serving to divide the working class through the related phenomenon of identity politics, and preserve the status quo by hampering unity of the working class. It is our duty as Marxists to oppose these counter-revolutionary ideas, and demonstrate the vast superiority of our dialectical materialist philosophy! 📖 WORKS CITED 📖 The case for theory: why communists should study philosophy | SPECTRE OF COMMUNISM: 🔗 • The case for theory: why communists should... Marxism vs. Postmodernism, Daniel Morley and Hamid Alizadeh: 🔗https://marxist.com/marxism-versus-po... Theological-Political Treatise, Baruch Spinoza: 🔗https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218... Hegel, G.F. W. (1975). Hegel's Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art [For the quote about an ignorant man not being free] 📖 WORKS CRITIQUED 📖 Gender Trouble (Tenth Edition), Judith Butler: 🔗https://selforganizedseminar.wordpres... The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Jean-François Lyotard: 🔗https://monoskop.org/images/e/e0/Lyot... The Subject and Power, Michel Foucault: 🔗https://www2.kobe-u.ac.jp/~alexroni/I... Differance, Jacques Derrida: 🔗https://mforbes.sites.gettysburg.edu/... Article about how the CIA used Foucault and postmodern ideas to their benefit: 🔗https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/the... ⏱️ TIMESTAMPS ⏱️ 00:00 - Intro 00:55 - What is postmodernism? 11:40 - Is language oppressive? 25:46 - 'Differance' vs Dialectics 31:58 - Are there objective patterns in the world? 40:42 - Is there a barrier between mind and matter? 01:00:54 - Practical impact of these ideas 🌐 LINKS 🌐 ✊ Join the Revolutionary Communist International: https://marxist.com/join-us.htm 🎧 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/68nGNHz... 📱 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... 📸 Instagram: / revcomintern 💬 Twitter: https://x.com/revcomintern/ ℹ️ DISCLAIMER ℹ️ This video is intended solely for educational, informational, and documentary purposes. It examines historical and contemporary political ideologies, events, and terminology — including controversial or sensitive topics — with the aim of fostering critical thinking and public understanding. This content does not promote, endorse, or glorify violence, right-wing extremism, terrorism, hate speech, or discriminatory ideologies. Any references to such topics are made in the context of analysis, journalism, or historical documentation. Viewer discretion is advised due to the sensitive nature of some discussed topics. All commentary is protected under fair use for educational and journalistic purposes in accordance with YouTube's community guidelines and policies.