У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The ‘Weapon’ That Changed British Warfare Forever или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Most people think of World War One as the era of machine guns and artillery. And they're right. But there's something odd about the early battles on the Western Front. German soldiers advancing toward British positions in 1914 reported facing what they believed were entire lines of machine guns. The problem was, the British Expeditionary Force barely had any machine guns at all. So what were they actually hearing? They were hearing the Lee-Enfield rifle. And the story of how one bolt-action rifle became Britain's secret weapon starts decades earlier, in a place most people wouldn't expect. In the 1880s, Britain had a problem. European armies were rapidly adopting magazine-fed repeating rifles while British soldiers were still using single-shot Martini-Henrys. The Empire needed to catch up, and fast. The solution came from James Paris Lee, a Scottish-Canadian inventor who designed something unusual for the time. His rifle used a detachable box magazine holding ten rounds and featured a rear-locking bolt system that was smoother and faster than anything else available. Britain paired Lee's action with a new .303 cartridge and adopted it in the 1890s. But here's what's interesting. Most European armies were perfectly happy with five-round magazines and stiff, deliberate bolt actions like the German Mauser. So why did Britain choose a rifle with double the capacity and a much faster action? In that sense, the Lee-Enfield wasn't just a weapon. It was the system that let Britain punch above its weight long after its empire began to fade. So what do you think? Was the Lee-Enfield exactly the rifle Britain needed, or did sticking with it delay something better? How might British military history have changed if they'd chosen a slower, smaller-capacity rifle instead? Let me know your thoughts in the comments. And if you enjoyed this deep dive into military history, hit subscribe so you don't miss the next one.