У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно REVEALED! A MILLION OF LIES IN THE HASTO AND PDIP TRIAL! или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Hasto Kristiyanto is now on the brink! In his drama of exception, he claims that he was criminalized for being critical of the government. But is that true? Let's dismantle his claims one by one which are full of false narratives and cheap framing! 💡 IMPORTANT FACTS: ✅ The Harun Masiku case is nothing new – Hasto has been linked to it since 2020! ✅ The claim of "criminalization" has failed! Many figures are more vocal than Hasto, but are not suspects! ✅ "Threats from state officials" without names, without evidence, just made-up stories! ✅ Jokowi does not pressure other parties with the law – Golkar continues to operate normally! All of these are facts, not assumptions! Watch this video until the end to find out who is really playing the drama in Indonesian politics! 📢 Don't forget to LIKE, COMMENT, and SHARE so that more people are aware of the political games that are happening! 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for the latest updates! 📌 YouTube Disclaimer: This video is based on data and facts available from various trusted sources. All opinions in this video are intended to provide objective political insight and analysis. There is no intention to spread hoaxes or attack certain parties personally. Please use the information in this video as a discussion and learning material. For business inquiries or copyright-related concerns, please contact us at: [email protected] Copyright Disclaimer – This content complies with YouTube's community guidelines and policies. Some materials used in this video fall under the fair use doctrine as outlined in Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976. This allows limited use of copyrighted material for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, teaching, and research. The intent is not to infringe copyright but to provide educational, transformative, and non-commercial value to the audience.