У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно JTI POLSKA Sp. Z o.o. and others (Respondents) v Jakubowski and others (Appellants) или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
The respondents contracted with the appellant hauliers to transport a consignment of cigarettes from Poland to England. The road carriage was undertaken subject to the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road 1956 ("the CMR"). During transit, whilst the driver's vehicle was parked in a motorway service station in England, thieves stole a number of cases of cigarettes. As a result, the respondents incurred excise duty pursuant to a European excise duty suspension arrangement, under which the cigarettes were deemed to have been released for commercial consumption in the UK following the theft. The respondents claimed compensation from the appellants under the CMR. The parties settled the claim save as to the excise duty, which the respondents claimed under article 23.4 of the CMR. Article 23.4 provides that, in the case of the loss of goods, a cargo claimant may claim "carriage charges, Customs duties and other charges incurred in respect of the carriage of the goods", in addition to the value of the goods. The House of Lords previously held in Buchanan that the words "other charges incurred in respect of the carriage of the goods" encompasses charges incurred because of the way that the goods were carried and lost, so that a cargo claimant can recover excise duty levied on goods stolen in transit. The appellants contend that the House of Lords decision in James Buchanan & Co. Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 ("Buchanan") was wrong and should be departed from. The issue is: Whether the Supreme Court should depart from the judgment of the House of Lords in Buchanan and hold that excise duty payable in respect of goods which are stolen in the course of international carriage by road cannot be claimed under article 23.44 of the CMR. More information is available on our website: UKSC 2021/0144