У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Leafy Destroys или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Leafy debates GodLogic on the Authenticity of The Great Commission. Discord: leafywashere Twitter: https://x.com/leafywashere00?s=21 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@1leafywashere... To join my server and gain access to my personal notes join my Patreon! Patreon: / membership Timestamps: 00:00:00 Intro 00:00:19 Leafy Introduction | Debate on the Trinity with a "God Logic clone" 00:01:52 Leafy Critique | Argues the Trinity is not explicitly preached in the Bible 00:04:20 Leafy Main Topic | The Christian cited Matthew as proof for the Trinity 00:05:17 Leafy Debate Starts | GodLogic joins to defend Matthew authenticity 00:07:58 GodLogic Argument | Agrees "in the name of" implies equality 00:12:56 Leafy Main Argument | Claims Matthew is an interpolation 00:13:02 Leafy Evidence 1 | Cites Eusebius quoting a variant reading ("in my name") 00:13:43 Leafy Evidence 2 | All baptisms in Acts are only "in the name of Jesus" 00:20:21 GodLogic Counter | All existing manuscripts contain the Trinitarian formula 00:27:42 GodLogic Rebuttal | "in the name of Jesus" is the same as "Father, Son, Holy Spirit" 00:31:40 Leafy Rebuttal | Interpolation happened before our earliest manuscripts 00:37:30 GodLogic External Evidence | Cites the Didache and Irenaeus 00:41:53 Leafy Internal Evidence | Context of Matthew uses a singular pronoun ("I") 00:46:14 Leafy Scholarly Source | Cites F.C. Conybeare on Eusebius and the Nicaean council 00:52:03 Leafy Scholarly Source | Cites James Dunn on the "Great Commission" 00:59:39 Leafy Conclusion | Challenges GodLogic to a formal debate