У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Madison’s Veto And Monroe’s Pivot или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
What if the road to American nation-building ran straight through a constitutional crossroads? We dig into James Madison’s veto of the Bonus Bill and James Monroe’s later twist on internal improvements to reveal how early presidents sketched the limits—and possibilities—of federal power. The stakes were not just roads and canals, but the meaning of the Spending Clause, the reach of the Commerce Clause, and whether “general welfare” is a guiding aim or a blank check. We start with Madison, who reversed himself on the Bank of the United States after the War of 1812 but drew a hard line on infrastructure. He argued that internal improvements weren’t in Article I, Section 8 and couldn’t be justified by commerce or a free-standing general welfare power. The fix, in his view, was simple and honest: pass a constitutional amendment. Anything else would blur the separation between national and state spheres and silence the courts’ ability to police the boundary. Then we follow Monroe, who began as Jefferson’s strict heir but offered a new path: Congress could tax and spend broadly for the general welfare, yet it couldn’t directly operate roads or impose toll regimes without distinct constitutional authority. This solution—the check without the control—helped fuel national development while preserving a role for states. Not everyone cheered. Henry Clay wanted internal improvements tethered to commerce and defense, not to an open-ended spending power that might, over time, wash out federalism. Across the conversation, we connect these 1810s choices to long arcs: Jackson’s partial return to Madison’s caution, nineteenth‑century workarounds like federal land grants, and the twentieth‑century settlement during the New Deal, when Congress’s spending power grew and the Supreme Court largely aligned with Monroe’s vision. Today’s highways, grants-in-aid, and policy “strings” still carry their fingerprints. Subscribe, share, and leave a review to tell us: whose constitutional map do you trust when building the next big public project? Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum (https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy...) ! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership (https://scetl.asu.edu/) Center for American Civics (https://civics.asu.edu/)