When Trademark Owners File 'Largely Unintelligible' UDRP Complaints скачать в хорошем качестве

When Trademark Owners File 'Largely Unintelligible' UDRP Complaints

Drafting a complaint under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) may seem like a simple process – but it's not. In this video, Doug Isenberg discusses two cases lost by trademark owners where the panels referred to "poorly prepared submissions" that were "so sparse as to be largely unintelligible" and where a complainant "failed to offer arguments or evidence to support any of its contentions." Resources: Scentsational Shoppe, Inc. v. Jeffrey Potts, The Common Scents, Inc., WIPO Case No. D2023-3525: https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/s... -USA QP ENTERPRISES Inc. dba USA Quickprint v. Admin Support / CR Consulting Ohio LLC, Forum Claim No. 2066056: https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisi... ​​- GigaLaw website: https://giga.law/ GigaLaw's Domain Dispute Digest: https://giga.law/digest ​- Domain Name Disputes: A Masterclass: https://giga.law/masterclass About Doug Isenberg: https://giga.law/about-doug-isenberg Disclaimer: This video is for general informational purposes only, provides only a summary of specific issues, and is not intended to be and should not be relied upon as legal advice regarding any specific situation. This video is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Viewers should consult with legal counsel to determine how laws, policies or decisions and other topics discussed in this video apply to the viewers' specific circumstances. This video may be considered attorney advertising under court rules of certain jurisdictions. Copyright © 2023 Douglas M. Isenberg