Judge Destroys Mom Over 3-Year-Old Police Statement – Where Would She Get That Idea? скачать в хорошем качестве

Judge Destroys Mom Over 3-Year-Old Police Statement – Where Would She Get That Idea?

Judge Destroys Mom Over 3-Year-Old Police Statement – Where Would She Get That Idea? In this jaw-dropping custody review, the court is dealing with a disturbing claim involving a 3-year-old child who allegedly said she’s scared her mom will “call the police again” — and that if mom does, she’ll have to leave dad’s house and go home. The judge immediately zeroes in on the most shocking part: “Where would she get the idea that a police officer can come get her and take her away from her dad?” This case (Henry Matlock vs. Jordan Martin) is already in progress after a March 7 hearing where the court found a prima facie case to modify the parenting plan and temporarily ordered every other weekend custody plus Wednesday visits. Now, dad’s attorney returns asking for more: a guardian ad litem (court investigator/child’s attorney), expanded overnights, and renewed concerns about what the child is being exposed to. Dad’s side claims the expanded schedule has mostly gone well — but raises red flags: the child allegedly arrives not bathed, hair matted, and not properly dressed mom allegedly smelled strongly of marijuana the child reportedly sleeps in the same bed as mom in a crowded home with multiple adults and only one bathroom and the biggest bombshell: the child repeating fear-based statements about police being used to remove her from dad’s care Mom denies she’s putting adult ideas in the child’s head and argues the child simply doesn’t like staying overnight with dad. She claims the “police idea” came from a past incident where she had to call law enforcement when there was no written plan. But dad’s attorney fires back: he says mom made an inappropriate police call out of anger, then refused to return the child — and that the officer basically said it was a civil matter without a court order. That’s when the court steps in to stabilize the case instead of letting the accusations spiral. ✅ What the Judge Ordered Next: ✅ A Guardian ad Litem will be appointed (neutral child-focused investigator/attorney) ✅ Dad agrees to front $1,000 so the investigation can happen (even though mom can’t pay) ✅ Guardian options: Susan Lockach first, then Josh Andrews if needed ✅ Expanded parenting time granted: ✅ Wednesday overnight (return Thursday morning by 8:00 a.m.) ✅ Sunday overnight on dad’s weekend (return Monday morning by 8:00 a.m.) ✅ Drug testing request denied again (court refuses to order hair follicle tests) ✅ Review hearing scheduled for July 21 at 11:00 a.m. (Zoom) to track progress and hopefully review the guardian’s report ⚖️ Watch till the end because the judge doesn’t just address the “police statement” — he orders a full investigation and expands dad’s overnights, signaling that the court is taking the child’s words seriously, even if the adults disagree about where they’re coming from. Disclaimer: This video is for educational/commentary purposes only. All statements are based on court proceedings/transcript and are not legal advice. #Courtroom #CustodyBattle #FamilyCourt #GuardianAdLitem #CourtCam #LegalDrama #ParentingTime #ChildCustody #CoParenting #RealCourtCases