У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Needlepoint bipolar ionization vs AirROS Surface & Air Purifiers или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
By SAGE Industrial www.AirROS.com You may be familiar with the term "ionizer" which is typically used to describe a device that produces ions. But, what does it mean when you read about Needlepoint Bipolar Ionization? This video explains the difference between bipolar ionization technology and AirROS advance systems, as well as how each one works. Schedule a call to learn more about ROS technology by clicking here https://bit.ly/Ionizer_vs_AirROS Here is the transcript to the video: Hi, my name is Sharla and I'm here today with Brian from AirROS by SAGE Industrial. And we get a lot of frequently asked questions. One that is very popular right now is what is the difference between bipolar ionization and AirROS? All right. So bipolar ionization or Needlepoint Bipolar Ionization is as tech is a technology that's using a voltage to create negative and positive ions and those negative and positive ions are basically interrupting basic the protein surface of pathogens. And so it's basically rendering them inactive. It's an effective technology, mostly applied in duct. I haven't seen it where they'll put hoods over product and in various applications, but what it's doing by releasing these ions into the environment is treating the air that's nearby. So the ions only lasts for milliseconds is the problem. So if you don't have a high enough airflow rate and the bipolar ionization device, isn't close enough to the surfaces, you're trying to treat, you're not going to get that surface treatment. So it's a good technology. It does produce an output. Let's say that can reach farther than the purifier, but its distance is really limited. Their claim to fame obviously is they don't produce ozone and they don't, you know they're, they're an energy-efficient solution. Well, their energy takes a whole lot more energy than our energy. So we're more energy efficient and we can reach far distances. We have units that can treat millions of cubic feet. Whereas bipolar ionization technology is limited a lot of times were to see in like eight feet or less. So there's a lot of times you have to use a lot of the device compared to one device that we may put in the same size room. So there's, there's definitely good parts to the ionization. We actually have ion ionization that happens in our chamber as well. So through the non-thermal plasma, a lot of them will say they have a plasma. They're not really plasma-based. But our non-thermal plasma does create reactive oxygen and ions as well, that will go and, and make it some distance down the duct if it's applied into a duct, but it's not gonna the ions don't last long enough. What lasts long enough is our ozone really low levels of ozone, really low levels of the dry hydrogen peroxide or gas-based hydrogen peroxide goes into the environment and that's where the trioxidane forms. And that's where we get our surface kill. So the main difference is they have some distance, some surface treatment, as long as it's local to what you're trying to treat, whereas we can treat anything in the room.