কেনেকৈ Zubeenৰ চৰিত্ৰহনন কৰিছে অতনুৱে? | ATANU BHUYAN KHAKI CONTROVERSY| ASSAMESENEWS। বিতৰ্কত খাকী скачать в хорошем качестве

কেনেকৈ Zubeenৰ চৰিত্ৰহনন কৰিছে অতনুৱে? | ATANU BHUYAN KHAKI CONTROVERSY| ASSAMESENEWS। বিতৰ্কত খাকী

Will Atanu Bhuyan’s upcoming Assamese film “Khaki” break records or create history as a massive flop? Even before its release, Khaki has landed in the middle of a fierce controversy. Senior journalist and YouTuber Atanu Bhuyan is facing severe backlash on social media, with calls for boycott, negative comments, and strong reactions from netizens. The controversy is linked to allegations of character assassination of popular Assamese singer Zubeen Garg, following earlier Facebook posts and YouTube discussions by Bhuyan. Zubeen Garg’s sister Pami Barthakur indirectly expressed her displeasure, which further fueled anger among Zubeen’s fans. As a result, Khaki has become a target of online outrage, with many predicting the film’s failure even before its release. Atanu Bhuyan has defended himself, claiming that all statements were based strictly on official charge sheets related to the Singapore court proceedings and not personal opinions or fabricated stories. He has also urged critics to verify facts before making public accusations. Despite the controversy, promotion for Khaki continues, though social media comment sections are flooded with negative reactions. 🎥 Watch this video till the end to understand: Why Atanu Bhuyan is facing public anger The Khaki movie controversy explained Clash between Pami Barthakur and Atanu Bhuyan Public reaction and boycott calls Whether Khaki will be a hit or flop 👉 Now tell us in the comments: Do you think Khaki will be a superhit or a superflop? 🔔 Subscribe & Support If you enjoy Assamese news, controversies, cinema updates, and unbiased analysis, 👉 SUBSCRIBE to our channel 👉 Like, Share & Comment to support Assamese digital journalism. ⚠️ Disclaimer (Fair Use) Disclaimer: This video is made for news reporting, criticism, commentary, and public awareness purposes only. All information presented is based on publicly available sources, media reports, and the creator’s voice-over interpretation. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. We do not intend to defame, harm, or target any individual or organization.