GMAT Critical Reasoning Practice | Boldface Reasoning Argument | Critical Reasoning Q6 скачать в хорошем качестве

GMAT Critical Reasoning Practice | Boldface Reasoning Argument | Critical Reasoning Q6

In this GMAT CR video, we explore a 'boldface reasoning argument' type question. This GMAT verbal practice question is part of a series of GMAT practice questions that help GMAT aspirants prep for GMAT Critical Reasoning Questions of all sorts - strengthen the argument, weaken the argument, evaluate the argument, and identify the reasoning. In this particular GMAT Prep question, you are expected to identify the role played by the statements in boldface. A medium difficulty GMAT CR question. ========= Useful GMAT Prep Links ======== Learn from GMAT 99%ile tutors - 2 way Interactive Classes - GMAT Focus Edition https://gmat.wizako.com/GMAT-prep-onl... Curated GMAT Focus Edition Online Course from GMAT 780 & GMAT Q51 tutors https://gmat.wizako.com/gmat-online-c... Download FREE CR Starter Guide: wzko.in/CR-starter ===================== Question: Studies have established that children who watched 2 more hours of TV on an average daily basis during the first 15 years of their life were 50℅ more likely to be arrested for property crimes in the country. *Researchers believe that these studies clearly establish that violence in movies and TV contributes to aggressive behavior in real life.* On the other hand, there is no clear evidence that the programs that the kids watched on TV were violent in the first place. Even if we were to accept that TV watching contributed to the increased crime rate, it need not have been because of the nature of the programs. *Perhaps, children who watched programs such as Adams and Samson, a funny sitcom about two blundering cops began perceiving all cops as incompetent.* What is the role of the sentences in boldface? Options: A. The first establishes a theory that the author later clearly refutes while the second presents the author's conclusion B. The first is an interpretation made by researchers that the author contends against and the second provides an alternative explanation for statistical data C. The first is an opinion expressed by someone other than the author and which the author is completely in disagreement with while the second provides the reason for the author's doubt D. The first is a fact supporting the researcher's conclusion while the second is the author's conclusion E. The first is a clearly proven opinion even if the author disagrees with it while the second is an ambiguous opinion that has no supporting data Chapters - 00:00 - Introduction 00:28 - Understanding the Argument 02:40 - Understanding the first boldface sentence 03:42 - Understanding the second boldface sentence 05:10 - Evaluating Option A 05:45 - Evaluating Option B 06:16 - Evaluating Option C 07:42 - Evaluating Option D 08:16 - Evaluating Option E 09:32 - Conclusion Subscribe for more GMAT Verbal and Quant content, GMAT practice questions, GMAT Study Plan updates @    / wizako   Schedule a free strategy session with our GMAT experts to ramp up your GMAT preparation: https://wzko.in/GmatStrategy Wizako's Live Online Classes for GMAT Quant and Verbal - Everything a Physical Classroom offers! More information @ https://wzko.in/live Free GMAT verbal practice and GMAT quant practice questions @ https://practice-questions.wizako.com... Schedule a free GMAT demo class right away: https://wzko.in/demo Sign up for the most comprehensive and affordable online GMAT course @ https://wzko.in/online Got 10 minutes? Get going with your GMAT prep. Take the FREE 10-minute GMAT sprint tests at https://wzko.in/ft Follow us on Instagram @   / wizakogmat   for regular GMAT updates!! #GMAT #CriticalReasoning #GMATCR #GMATCriticalReasoning #BoldfaceReasoning #GMATVerbalPractice #GMATVerbal #MBA